Active Users:385 Time:01/05/2025 09:37:26 AM
Too bad she didn't take the opportunity to drop the Oaths altogether. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 02:14:32 PM
I'm so sick of them. I think it permanently makes the Aes Sedai illegitimate and passive.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 23/03/2010 04:45:00 PM 1538 Views
Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute *NM* - 23/03/2010 05:40:32 PM 364 Views
Unswear VS Still - 23/03/2010 11:31:18 PM 832 Views
Re: Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute - 24/03/2010 04:53:23 AM 711 Views
Re: so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 24/03/2010 03:08:21 AM 744 Views
Re: so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 24/03/2010 12:32:05 PM 677 Views
I had a related question about the oath rod: - 24/03/2010 10:07:52 AM 1084 Views
Non-channelers cannot use oath rod - 24/03/2010 12:04:53 PM 845 Views
Re: Non-channelers cannot use oath rod - 24/03/2010 03:26:43 PM 1028 Views
Too bad she didn't take the opportunity to drop the Oaths altogether. - 25/03/2010 02:14:32 PM 734 Views
Unthinkable - 25/03/2010 03:35:56 PM 727 Views
Agreed - 25/03/2010 07:30:46 PM 763 Views
Re: Agreed - 26/03/2010 04:51:18 PM 682 Views
yup - 27/03/2010 09:04:30 PM 614 Views
I disagree. The Oaths are among the least irritating of the many irritating things about Aes Sedai. - 27/03/2010 09:56:34 PM 668 Views
I'm with ya Templar. They have ways around everything. *NM* - 29/03/2010 06:07:00 AM 319 Views
Except when they're leashed to an a'dam *NM* - 29/03/2010 08:28:05 AM 296 Views
I would have loved it if Nynaeve, Egwene and Elayne went off and started their own organizations - 02/04/2010 06:04:30 PM 836 Views
well they're not the daughters of silence thats for sure - 11/04/2010 07:13:42 PM 646 Views
maybe a slight redo. - 11/04/2010 07:11:01 PM 625 Views
i thought - 31/03/2010 01:02:19 AM 624 Views

Reply to Message