Active Users:855 Time:07/08/2025 03:10:59 PM
exactly saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 31/03/2010 01:12:59 AM
true. However, in my best recollection, RJ was always very careful in his his reference to the culprit to avoid unintended clues. If you are right, given the volume of Q&A on Asmo, there should be other instances where RJ said "he", and/or if those instances demonstrate the reference was not a hint--if he says "he" but also refuses to give a clue. the contradiction would IMO demonstrate the "he" had no meaning.
Reply to message
A second RJ slip up as to Asmo's killer? - 31/03/2010 12:31:52 AM 1396 Views
He said, "he", because Slayer is a boy (has a pee pee). *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:06:04 AM 232 Views
c'mon - 31/03/2010 01:39:46 AM 645 Views
Ishamael went to the darkside because - 31/03/2010 01:06:14 AM 769 Views
exactly - 31/03/2010 01:12:59 AM 634 Views
That's actually proper English. - 31/03/2010 03:07:05 AM 1138 Views
Re: That's actually proper English. - 31/03/2010 03:44:49 AM 853 Views
Moot - 31/03/2010 05:25:59 AM 605 Views
Re: That's actually proper English. - 31/03/2010 01:12:03 PM 879 Views
Well... - 31/03/2010 01:57:44 PM 589 Views
I brought this up before, and I think RJ slipped here. *NM* - 31/03/2010 09:20:07 AM 212 Views
This is nothing. - 31/03/2010 02:37:28 PM 608 Views
You're assuming - 31/03/2010 04:13:20 PM 561 Views
Re: You're assuming - 31/03/2010 04:35:35 PM 532 Views
Re: A second RJ slip up as to Asmo's killer? - 31/03/2010 06:34:48 PM 611 Views
Re: A second RJ slip up as to Asmo's killer? - 31/03/2010 07:01:14 PM 557 Views

Reply to Message