Meh. Growing pains. And unlike the White Tower split, this will not be a refreshing shake-up
Cannoli Send a noteboard - 16/04/2010 02:45:21 PM
I don't think you can count on the Asha'man [as a whole] as being reliable or loyal to Rand. We still have Elaida's prophecy of the Black Tower being "rent in blood and flame with Sisters walking its grounds"... and from what we last saw, that's most likely to arise from internal matters.
Notice how no one argues that the Tower split was anything but a welcome respite that gave the good guys much needed breathing room. The Tower as it existed would have hindered the rise of the people needed to save the world. By contrast, no one says the samething about the Black Tower - the anticipated split is dreaded as another problem for Rand & co.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Does Rand really need the White Tower?
- 15/04/2010 06:42:36 PM
1329 Views
No. I can understand/appreciate the arguments, but IMHO the White Tower AS are not that valuable
- 15/04/2010 07:27:23 PM
801 Views
Re: Does Rand really need the White Tower?
- 15/04/2010 09:29:50 PM
631 Views
Meh. Growing pains. And unlike the White Tower split, this will not be a refreshing shake-up
- 16/04/2010 02:45:21 PM
763 Views
Depends
- 16/04/2010 06:50:53 AM
704 Views
some respectful disagreement, if you don't mind
- 17/04/2010 04:04:32 AM
680 Views
On the other hand,you recently argued that sending away Else was a capital mistake by Siuan
- 16/04/2010 09:29:56 AM
694 Views
And the WT, even (or maybe especially) under Egwene is the greatest obstacle to that unity
- 16/04/2010 02:50:24 PM
665 Views
Re: And the WT, even (or maybe especially) under Egwene is the greatest obstacle to that unity
- 23/04/2010 11:08:58 PM
706 Views