Active Users:103 Time:01/12/2022 05:36:27 PM
Well, you leave out the related article, and doctors' arguments... Ignator - 29/01/2003 07:48:50 PM

Personally I find it rather amusing. Not the intialing of the organ, but instead the reaction.

As for the uterus, it is sort-of immature, but it does not affect anything. Anything at all, so if the doctor enjoys it, I don't see why not. It was, however, likely that others would react the same way, and he should have tried to avoid the chance of getting sued.

The reaction, though was rather funny. I have never seen such anger over something that did not mater.

"It was a mockery to my body. This was an organ that created my two beautiful children, and I wanted it discarded with respect. And it wasn't. It was used as a toy in the operating room without my consent."

This, itself, is rather overexagerated. I can see people wanting dead relatives to be treated respectfully, as they had had a connection to the person in life. I can see people burying dead pets with respect, but not as strongly as the relatives. They too had an emotion connection to the owner. The list goes on, but a temorary organ? I mean, what kind of person forms a strong emotional bond with thier uterus?

"So I felt as though I was an insignificant person. I question, would he have done this to the governor's wife or someone of great importance?"

I could perhaps see slight anger, but feeling insignificant? I, for the life of me, could not figure out why. And to the second question, probably yes.

"It has affected my marriage and my children. Even my children today are offended by just looking at a UK sign."

Affected the marraiage? How? Perhaps... Nevermind; I still can't think of a reason. Help?

And how would it affect the children? (I would guess the children were born recently.) Or did they learn about childbirth alot younger then I did?

Besides, from different sites:

(I can not say wether or not they are true, but...)

"The uterus-branding doctor from Lexington, Kentucky, J. Michael Guiler, has ended his silence and offered an explanation for his actions: the markings were for orientation purposes due to the limited view during the laparoscopic-assisted vaginal/Doderlein hysterectomy. According to the Lexington Herald-Leader, one doctor from the University of Louisville said it would have been malpractice not to make similar markings for orientation purposes." http://www.jeffcross.net/archives/2003_01.html

"The surgeon is now claiming that he used the initials only to divide the uterus in half from left to right and top to bottom." http://www.heldincontempt.com/

Or, explained in different words:

http://www.kentucky.com/mld/heraldleader/5054429.htm

To end, perhaps it is not funny; I feel sorry for the doctor.


Ignator Asha'man

Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
-Isaac Asimov

The Wheel Weaves as the Wheel Wills

Link. Click. Or don't.

This message last edited by Ignator on 1/29/2003 at 10:15:12 PM.




Link. Click. Or don't.
View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
what does everyone think about this.....? - 29/01/2003 04:29:59 PM 245 Views
I'd have to agree with that mook. - 29/01/2003 04:35:40 PM 23 Views
yeah, if it wasn't for the tape, who would ever know? - 29/01/2003 04:50:10 PM 10 Views
Go Terps? - 29/01/2003 04:36:21 PM 17 Views
good point....maybe I could overlook it if it were UCONN *NM* - 29/01/2003 04:51:54 PM 10 Views
LMAO They have a hot team this year. *NM* - 29/01/2003 05:00:35 PM 2 Views
The part that bothers me is the lack of professionalism. - 29/01/2003 04:40:14 PM 22 Views
that's what I'm saying.... - 29/01/2003 04:46:43 PM 18 Views
Agree - 29/01/2003 04:53:16 PM 14 Views
Re: Ugh - 29/01/2003 04:42:41 PM 29 Views
Re: Ugh - 29/01/2003 05:20:40 PM 14 Views
as I posted up above in another reply... - 29/01/2003 05:25:31 PM 9 Views
Re: as I posted up above in another reply... - 29/01/2003 05:28:35 PM 11 Views
Yahoo news *NM* - 29/01/2003 05:32:47 PM 5 Views
Re: Did you see the picture? - 29/01/2003 05:33:35 PM 14 Views
Re: Did you see the picture? - 29/01/2003 05:45:37 PM 13 Views
Re: Thanks for the updated story... - 29/01/2003 05:57:52 PM 10 Views
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse... - 30/01/2003 05:25:04 AM 8 Views
Re: Ugh - 29/01/2003 06:09:34 PM 10 Views
hmmmmm - 29/01/2003 05:19:06 PM 16 Views
Uh....yeah - 29/01/2003 06:18:51 PM 14 Views
*snickers at Alana* - 29/01/2003 07:07:10 PM 12 Views
I can't like that. *NM* - 29/01/2003 06:38:33 PM 2 Views
sick and degrading. I would be majorly pissed off as well. *NM* - 29/01/2003 06:48:29 PM 4 Views
Lovely... - 29/01/2003 07:04:49 PM 15 Views
Well, you leave out the related article, and doctors' arguments... - 29/01/2003 07:48:50 PM 23 Views
Grrr. - 29/01/2003 09:12:59 PM 11 Views
In a wierd kinda way I admire his style - still a bit wrong though - 30/01/2003 06:19:03 AM 4 Views
It would be a fitting punishment if they branded his testcals - 30/01/2003 11:59:01 AM 5 Views
Please Read This!!! - 30/01/2003 08:15:15 PM 9 Views