Active Users:218 Time:20/04/2024 12:21:43 PM
Back to Messageboard Search My Favourite Threads
Yeah, but they're still two separate issues. The Logic Ninja - 12/04/2004 02:12:50 AM

As in 6,000 years old, or whatever, it would completely change the theory of Evolution.
But if evolution is not, in fact, a fact, it doesn't matter how old the earth is. They're two different issues, just like abiogenesis--the origin of life--and evolution are two different issues.

You'll respond that there's no way the Earth is that young, but my point still holds. Evolution only works if the Earth is old enough to allow its gradual effects. Otherwise, it's just a good crack at figuring out where all those bones and similar phenotypes come from.
Good thing that it's been proven, over and over, that the earth IS that old, huh?


I am not yet born, console me.
I fear that the human race may with tall walls wall me,
with strong drugs dope me, with wise lies lure me,
on black racks rack me, in blood-baths roll me.




View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
I find it odd that many religious people are still anti-evolution Gavroche - 11/04/2004 06:08:32 PM 260 Views
Not everyone acknowledges the Pope. *NM* Vivien - 11/04/2004 06:15:07 PM 13 Views
I'm sorry... but this was somehow extremely funny. *NM* Danae alThor - 11/04/2004 06:20:20 PM 12 Views
I can see it now..."You just knocked over the Pope!" Arok Manok - 11/04/2004 06:25:47 PM 63 Views
Heh. Cool smiley. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 11/04/2004 09:49:25 PM 6 Views
I forgive you. *NM* Vivien - 11/04/2004 06:43:04 PM 7 Views
For one thing, while most Christians respect him, not all are Catholic Arok Manok - 11/04/2004 06:24:41 PM 62 Views
of course, that can be referred to my post lower on the board Gavroche - 11/04/2004 07:03:31 PM 26 Views
As to Catholics Alexandros - 11/04/2004 07:56:18 PM 23 Views
Shouldn't it be the other way around? The Logic Ninja - 11/04/2004 08:37:27 PM 36 Views
Of course not. Alexandros - 11/04/2004 09:34:38 PM 25 Views
You know... farmboy - 12/04/2004 04:25:25 AM 20 Views
Also, where did Caine's wife come from? The Logic Ninja - 12/04/2004 06:35:28 AM 25 Views
Exactly! farmboy - 12/04/2004 02:19:40 PM 16 Views
Wow, what an original point!!!! Green Gaidin - 13/04/2004 05:01:22 AM 12 Views
Demonsesese! *NM* Arok Manok - 13/04/2004 11:07:02 AM 6 Views
Mel Gibson's dad snoopster - 12/04/2004 05:27:41 AM 22 Views
Well, to be fair, Jews are not Christians... Arok Manok - 13/04/2004 11:12:03 AM 11 Views
Not my meaning snoopster - 15/04/2004 07:14:24 AM 5 Views
*arrives in a hijacked popemobile* chorabliss - 11/04/2004 07:15:03 PM 45 Views
Do you have some good papal history links? *NM* ÐragonForever - 12/04/2004 05:30:09 AM 7 Views
id reccomend reading books on it chorabliss - 15/04/2004 12:55:01 PM 5 Views
People that don't are mostly literal-believers. Alexandros - 11/04/2004 07:37:35 PM 24 Views
I feel that too many people are becoming Arian-type Christians. Arok Manok - 13/04/2004 11:16:48 AM 10 Views
are you really suprised? Mat Maniac - 11/04/2004 08:11:01 PM 31 Views
Please note The Logic Ninja - 11/04/2004 08:45:22 PM 26 Views
Re: Please note Mat Maniac - 12/04/2004 01:45:31 AM 15 Views
I agree. Evolution may be the method reason understands... Arok Manok - 13/04/2004 12:01:24 PM 8 Views
people prefer mysticism and faith to fact and science wads - 11/04/2004 10:41:41 PM 32 Views
Thought I was gonna have to disagree with you. Arok Manok - 12/04/2004 01:27:16 AM 30 Views
A snide response. The Logic Ninja - 12/04/2004 09:13:12 PM 14 Views
But there IS evidence. Just not published in Science journals. Green Gaidin - 13/04/2004 05:12:40 AM 14 Views
Geez. The Logic Ninja - 13/04/2004 08:00:07 AM 18 Views
The point of faith is that you don't need scientific proof. Arok Manok - 13/04/2004 11:39:14 AM 11 Views
You do realize The Logic Ninja - 13/04/2004 03:49:06 PM 13 Views
Science is based on sensible assumptions... Monotonous Mantra - 13/04/2004 11:49:54 AM 12 Views
He doesn't see it that way because he sees his faith as quantifiable. *NM* Arok Manok - 13/04/2004 11:54:47 AM 5 Views
Yeah, *sensible assumptions*, The Logic Ninja - 13/04/2004 03:13:43 PM 11 Views
But not proven Monotonous Mantra - 13/04/2004 03:15:50 PM 10 Views
Huh? The Logic Ninja - 13/04/2004 03:54:38 PM 12 Views
True Monotonous Mantra - 13/04/2004 04:05:10 PM 12 Views
You can't prove existential negatives. The Logic Ninja - 13/04/2004 04:22:17 PM 11 Views
Re: You can't prove existential negatives. Monotonous Mantra - 13/04/2004 04:34:02 PM 9 Views
See THEOLOGY for Reason in support of Faith. *NM* Arok Manok - 13/04/2004 11:53:43 AM 7 Views
Like what? The Logic Ninja - 13/04/2004 04:23:31 PM 7 Views
Next time you're in the barber chair... Arok Manok - 13/04/2004 11:19:52 AM 12 Views
You still don't get it. The Logic Ninja - 13/04/2004 03:09:56 PM 14 Views
Furthermore, the age of the world is a separate issue from evolution. *NM* The Logic Ninja - 12/04/2004 12:08:34 AM 9 Views
Not entirely. If a Christian found a way to prove the Earth was young Arok Manok - 12/04/2004 01:36:12 AM 23 Views
Yeah, but they're still two separate issues. The Logic Ninja - 12/04/2004 02:12:50 AM 17 Views
They are linked, and one requires the other. Arok Manok - 13/04/2004 11:43:43 AM 12 Views
No. No, not really. The Logic Ninja - 13/04/2004 03:51:51 PM 7 Views
*shrugs* Nebhead - 12/04/2004 06:19:05 AM 16 Views
I think it is silly to hold onto beliefs from a book written by , you kazetaran - 12/04/2004 10:31:13 AM 26 Views
it's not the catholics mierin sedai - 13/04/2004 03:55:14 PM 13 Views
Back to Messageboard Search My Favourite Threads

Formatting
Smiley Codes