Active Users:371 Time:12/12/2024 05:18:33 PM
There were probably several. The Logic Ninja - 20/04/2004 03:54:48 AM

More likely than not someone who briefly resurrected the order of Rome after 410AD. Probably tied into the entire celtic mythology though and thus magnified over time by various literary sources.

Do any of them, or all of them, compose a Historical King Arthur, though?


I am not yet born, console me.
I fear that the human race may with tall walls wall me,
with strong drugs dope me, with wise lies lure me,
on black racks rack me, in blood-baths roll me.




View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
King Arthur: real or not? - 19/04/2004 01:16:21 PM 195 Views
But, I bought a Round Table on Ebay *NM* - 19/04/2004 01:17:51 PM 6 Views
Mine had a sword stuck in it. *NM* - 19/04/2004 10:54:28 PM 4 Views
*counts his money* - 20/04/2004 04:44:29 AM 5 Views
I think there prolly was... - 19/04/2004 01:18:31 PM 18 Views
I doubt it - 19/04/2004 01:26:01 PM 35 Views
That isn't surprising. - 19/04/2004 01:27:36 PM 21 Views
oooh - 19/04/2004 01:29:13 PM 19 Views
Just a tuppence - 19/04/2004 01:32:00 PM 17 Views
*sigh* - 19/04/2004 01:33:34 PM 15 Views
I saw somewhere - 19/04/2004 02:50:44 PM 12 Views
lol - 19/04/2004 03:13:25 PM 10 Views
*looks sheepish* no but i will look for you. - 19/04/2004 03:40:36 PM 7 Views
lol. it isn't very important - 19/04/2004 04:29:23 PM 6 Views
Re: King Arthur: real or not? - 19/04/2004 01:27:47 PM 18 Views
But is that a "King Arthur"? - 19/04/2004 01:31:11 PM 14 Views
well, I dont' think a "historical King Arthur" ever existed - 19/04/2004 02:06:29 PM 8 Views
As far as I know - 19/04/2004 01:37:41 PM 17 Views
Would you like to buy a Round Table? Special price for you my friend - 19/04/2004 03:31:14 PM 10 Views
Only if you throw in Excalibur too - 20/04/2004 11:10:48 AM 12 Views
*ROAR!* - 20/04/2004 07:59:42 PM 8 Views
eek - 21/04/2004 10:05:07 AM 8 Views
Indisputably Real - 19/04/2004 01:55:18 PM 43 Views
Well - 19/04/2004 01:56:41 PM 15 Views
I think there is some historical basis - 19/04/2004 05:18:44 PM 9 Views
Arthur Real but not like in the stories - 19/04/2004 07:42:39 PM 8 Views
nice post - 19/04/2004 09:24:46 PM 11 Views
There probably was a leader between 400 and 700 ad called Artur. - 19/04/2004 09:38:41 PM 15 Views
There were probably several. - 20/04/2004 03:54:48 AM 9 Views
Real! - 19/04/2004 11:11:44 PM 7 Views
Yay! Arthur! - 19/04/2004 11:12:54 PM 5 Views
Yes and no - 20/04/2004 04:47:03 AM 10 Views
Saw a show on the History Channel - 22/04/2004 02:47:47 AM 6 Views
Maybe it was Arthur Dent. - 22/04/2004 04:16:22 PM 6 Views