Active Users:1025 Time:31/01/2026 09:13:21 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Not in The Lord of the Rings, where phenomenal amounts of backstory Danae al'Thor Send a noteboard - 26/06/2010 12:30:51 AM
I think.

Even though that is a silly thought, probably - some unimportant character can easily be named several dozen times in a few paragraphs and so get to more mentions than, apparently, the rather important Cirdan. I'm guessing the Appendices have been left out of this.


only show up in the Appendices. Gildor, for instance, and Cirdan, do not actually take up much space in the main text/s. Helm Hammerhand isn't there at all, just mentioned because of a geographical-historical-strategic coincidence. He's not an important character in the text's present. He's very important backstory, and history.

Tolkien beat us around the head with several things, but every so often he'd do it just one per item, but with great precision and force, so it stays with us even though it wasn't repeated.

It's not all that surprising, is all.

I'll tell you the one I find shocking? Goldberry. Really? She wasn't mentioned all that much... was she?
http://coolingpearls.wordpress.com/
http://uncategoricallyroh.wordpress.com/
http://whaq.blogspot.com/
~Roh
Reply to message
Lord of the Rings character quiz on Sporcle Tigr - 25/06/2010 04:09:13 PM 1413 Views
38 - getting them all or close to all would be impressive indeed. Legolas - 25/06/2010 05:30:33 PM 901 Views
37. I am so upset I couldn't remember Glorfindel's name. Rebekah - 25/06/2010 06:02:33 PM 913 Views
Re: 37. I am so upset I couldn't remember Glorfindel's name. Camilla - 25/06/2010 06:35:36 PM 868 Views
Heh nossy - 25/06/2010 11:02:56 PM 983 Views
I also couldn't remember his name. Seriana Sedai - 29/06/2010 09:33:56 PM 1038 Views
46. - But that was trial and error Camilla - 25/06/2010 06:35:02 PM 879 Views
I know! So weird. Legolas - 25/06/2010 10:19:07 PM 918 Views
Re: I know! So weird. Camilla - 25/06/2010 10:22:55 PM 935 Views
Re: Basically I think we are judging by importance of role/status. The game judges by number. Danae al'Thor - 25/06/2010 11:45:42 PM 886 Views
I realize, but you'd think the two would coincide more. Legolas - 26/06/2010 12:19:05 AM 899 Views
Re: Not in The Lord of the Rings, where phenomenal amounts of backstory Danae al'Thor - 26/06/2010 12:30:51 AM 1029 Views
Apparently, yeah. Legolas - 26/06/2010 12:42:29 AM 914 Views
Re: He is this elf Danae al'Thor - 26/06/2010 12:49:22 AM 1053 Views
It just registers every time the word is said. Tom Bombadil couldn't stop talking about the bitch. Tom - 26/06/2010 01:17:42 AM 900 Views
Re: You're so jealous! *NM* Danae al'Thor - 26/06/2010 04:33:23 PM 498 Views
I know. *NM* Tom - 26/06/2010 08:51:17 PM 436 Views
35. Not too shabby. nossy - 25/06/2010 11:00:09 PM 844 Views
40, but I'll admit that I took it last night too. Darth_Katie - 25/06/2010 11:15:04 PM 940 Views
Re: 45. (naming a few names) Danae al'Thor - 25/06/2010 11:44:02 PM 997 Views
I had my fair share of names I didn't know, too, but I can help with those... Legolas - 26/06/2010 12:39:09 AM 864 Views
Re: I'm going through my books now, actually. Danae al'Thor - 26/06/2010 12:49:53 AM 1032 Views
Bill is both the pony, and the nosy jerk in Bree (who they bought the pony from I think) imlad - 29/06/2010 03:16:18 AM 1184 Views
I only got 39. Tom - 26/06/2010 01:13:24 AM 895 Views
You people are nerds. jh - 26/06/2010 01:15:15 AM 998 Views
Stop trying to make yourself feel better. nossy - 26/06/2010 03:13:32 AM 928 Views
35 as well, and I'm retarded/haven't thought about LotR in way too long.... DREWRULESWOT! - 26/06/2010 01:18:51 AM 988 Views
29. I'm awesome. Virtually everyone I remembered was from the movies. Ghavrel - 26/06/2010 06:59:41 AM 905 Views
I've not read the books for about 7 years. Rebekah - 26/06/2010 09:46:38 AM 975 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years. Camilla - 26/06/2010 10:51:33 AM 901 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years. Rebekah - 26/06/2010 10:54:59 AM 943 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years. Camilla - 26/06/2010 10:56:43 AM 860 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years. Rebekah - 26/06/2010 10:57:59 AM 936 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years. Camilla - 26/06/2010 11:03:14 AM 1061 Views
Re: Lord of the Rings character quiz on Sporcle ajah - 26/06/2010 08:15:59 AM 955 Views
27. I almost forgot Sauron and spend ages trying to recall what the spider was called in English *NM* Lordling - 26/06/2010 04:24:21 PM 466 Views
29, pretty much the first column and only a few more. ironclad - 28/06/2010 10:57:09 AM 877 Views
35 of out 50 imlad - 29/06/2010 03:08:00 AM 986 Views
38. Of the 12 I missed, 8 were dead t/o the series dadof5 - 29/06/2010 02:14:31 PM 911 Views
Re: 38. Of the 12 I missed, 8 were dead t/o the series Camilla - 29/06/2010 03:31:19 PM 939 Views
Re: 38. Of the 12 I missed, 8 were dead t/o the series Seriana Sedai - 29/06/2010 09:37:56 PM 986 Views
I went and searched a bit, and yes, seems it does include the Appendices. Legolas - 30/06/2010 10:47:18 PM 978 Views
4 random thoughts - 29/06/2010 07:14:07 PM 906 Views
37 'sif Shadowfax counts as a character *NM* rAndy aL - 05/07/2010 07:58:40 AM 536 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes