I went and searched a bit, and yes, seems it does include the Appendices.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 30/06/2010 10:47:18 PM
Arvedui does indeed get about two dozen mentions - one reason why he gets more than ultimately more important people is that his story is sort of told twice in Appendix A, once in the history of Arnor part, once in the history of Gondor part. In LotR itself, the Index claims he's mentioned exactly once, and in a footnote at that.
And yeah, if it does include the Appendices, it would explain why Arvedui is in the list and Elbereth, Beren, Luthien, Earendil, and so on are not, even if they're mentioned many more times in the text - Elbereth is mentioned in at least ten different places according to the Index. I would suspect Helm Hammerhand makes it to 29 mentions without counting Helm's Deep - you'd get to a fair few more then. Helm gets to 21 mentions in four pages in the Appendices, so then 29 total isn't that much. People like Eorl, Thorin and Durin likely get most of their mentions in the Appendices, too.
And yeah, if it does include the Appendices, it would explain why Arvedui is in the list and Elbereth, Beren, Luthien, Earendil, and so on are not, even if they're mentioned many more times in the text - Elbereth is mentioned in at least ten different places according to the Index. I would suspect Helm Hammerhand makes it to 29 mentions without counting Helm's Deep - you'd get to a fair few more then. Helm gets to 21 mentions in four pages in the Appendices, so then 29 total isn't that much. People like Eorl, Thorin and Durin likely get most of their mentions in the Appendices, too.
Lord of the Rings character quiz on Sporcle
25/06/2010 04:09:13 PM
- 1306 Views
38 - getting them all or close to all would be impressive indeed.
25/06/2010 05:30:33 PM
- 777 Views
46. - But that was trial and error
25/06/2010 06:35:02 PM
- 793 Views
I know! So weird.
25/06/2010 10:19:07 PM
- 825 Views
Re: Basically I think we are judging by importance of role/status. The game judges by number.
25/06/2010 11:45:42 PM
- 803 Views
I realize, but you'd think the two would coincide more.
26/06/2010 12:19:05 AM
- 786 Views
Re: Not in The Lord of the Rings, where phenomenal amounts of backstory
26/06/2010 12:30:51 AM
- 916 Views
It just registers every time the word is said. Tom Bombadil couldn't stop talking about the bitch.
26/06/2010 01:17:42 AM
- 808 Views
Re: 45. (naming a few names)
25/06/2010 11:44:02 PM
- 912 Views
I had my fair share of names I didn't know, too, but I can help with those...
26/06/2010 12:39:09 AM
- 769 Views
Bill is both the pony, and the nosy jerk in Bree (who they bought the pony from I think)
29/06/2010 03:16:18 AM
- 1085 Views
35 as well, and I'm retarded/haven't thought about LotR in way too long....
26/06/2010 01:18:51 AM
- 891 Views
29. I'm awesome. Virtually everyone I remembered was from the movies.
26/06/2010 06:59:41 AM
- 819 Views
I've not read the books for about 7 years.
26/06/2010 09:46:38 AM
- 854 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years.
26/06/2010 10:51:33 AM
- 813 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years.
26/06/2010 10:54:59 AM
- 843 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years.
26/06/2010 10:56:43 AM
- 763 Views
27. I almost forgot Sauron and spend ages trying to recall what the spider was called in English *NM*
26/06/2010 04:24:21 PM
- 419 Views
38. Of the 12 I missed, 8 were dead t/o the series
29/06/2010 02:14:31 PM
- 796 Views
Re: 38. Of the 12 I missed, 8 were dead t/o the series
29/06/2010 03:31:19 PM
- 835 Views
I went and searched a bit, and yes, seems it does include the Appendices.
30/06/2010 10:47:18 PM
- 879 Views