Funny, I'd had TtH in mind when referencing Erikson.
Macharius Send a noteboard - 24/08/2010 05:40:12 PM
On reflection, I think the main source of complaints about TtH and EriKson could be dealt with by better editing, rather than trying to change the writing itself.
This message last edited by Macharius on 24/08/2010 at 07:16:48 PM
The Way of Kings - Brief Review
24/08/2010 12:54:39 AM
- 1275 Views
As someone who could not finish Misborn through multiple tries I have to say...
24/08/2010 02:57:01 AM
- 626 Views
I didn't quite have such a positive reaction to the book
24/08/2010 04:55:04 AM
- 686 Views
You know...
24/08/2010 02:07:04 PM
- 614 Views
Re: You know...
24/08/2010 02:46:16 PM
- 751 Views
Okay, that makes better sense.
24/08/2010 05:07:56 PM
- 561 Views
Well, you've seen the books I tend to read and those are unusual in regards to dialogue quality
24/08/2010 05:22:10 PM
- 658 Views
The only Sanderson I've read is Elantris
24/08/2010 11:56:28 AM
- 620 Views
Elantris is a very poor example of Sanderson's work.
24/08/2010 01:59:05 PM
- 595 Views
A very good review, and thank you.
24/08/2010 02:01:05 PM
- 558 Views
My WoK reaction
24/08/2010 03:14:58 PM
- 697 Views
I call bullshit on the Erickson comments!
24/08/2010 03:34:20 PM
- 618 Views
Yes there is a very big difference between the two...
24/08/2010 04:58:55 PM
- 537 Views
And I think that books 5, 6, and 8 are among Erikson's better novels
24/08/2010 05:06:43 PM
- 568 Views
Yes, I wondered why you stopped doing those... you've only posted up to HoC, I believe.
24/08/2010 05:22:17 PM
- 532 Views
Funny, I'd had TtH in mind when referencing Erikson.
24/08/2010 05:40:12 PM
- 519 Views