Funny, I'd had TtH in mind when referencing Erikson.
Macharius Send a noteboard - 24/08/2010 05:40:12 PM
On reflection, I think the main source of complaints about TtH and EriKson could be dealt with by better editing, rather than trying to change the writing itself.
This message last edited by Macharius on 24/08/2010 at 07:16:48 PM
The Way of Kings - Brief Review
- 24/08/2010 12:54:39 AM
1606 Views
As someone who could not finish Misborn through multiple tries I have to say...
- 24/08/2010 02:57:01 AM
930 Views
I didn't quite have such a positive reaction to the book
- 24/08/2010 04:55:04 AM
1000 Views
You know...
- 24/08/2010 02:07:04 PM
926 Views
Re: You know...
- 24/08/2010 02:46:16 PM
1092 Views
Okay, that makes better sense.
- 24/08/2010 05:07:56 PM
873 Views
Well, you've seen the books I tend to read and those are unusual in regards to dialogue quality
- 24/08/2010 05:22:10 PM
985 Views
- 24/08/2010 05:22:10 PM
985 Views
The only Sanderson I've read is Elantris
- 24/08/2010 11:56:28 AM
916 Views
Elantris is a very poor example of Sanderson's work.
- 24/08/2010 01:59:05 PM
921 Views
A very good review, and thank you.
- 24/08/2010 02:01:05 PM
866 Views
My WoK reaction
- 24/08/2010 03:14:58 PM
1031 Views
I call bullshit on the Erickson comments!
- 24/08/2010 03:34:20 PM
948 Views
- 24/08/2010 03:34:20 PM
948 Views
Yes there is a very big difference between the two...
- 24/08/2010 04:58:55 PM
842 Views
And I think that books 5, 6, and 8 are among Erikson's better novels
- 24/08/2010 05:06:43 PM
890 Views
Yes, I wondered why you stopped doing those... you've only posted up to HoC, I believe.
- 24/08/2010 05:22:17 PM
836 Views
Funny, I'd had TtH in mind when referencing Erikson.
- 24/08/2010 05:40:12 PM
825 Views
