Funny, I'd had TtH in mind when referencing Erikson.
Macharius Send a noteboard - 24/08/2010 05:40:12 PM
On reflection, I think the main source of complaints about TtH and EriKson could be dealt with by better editing, rather than trying to change the writing itself.
This message last edited by Macharius on 24/08/2010 at 07:16:48 PM
The Way of Kings - Brief Review
- 24/08/2010 12:54:39 AM
1686 Views
As someone who could not finish Misborn through multiple tries I have to say...
- 24/08/2010 02:57:01 AM
993 Views
I didn't quite have such a positive reaction to the book
- 24/08/2010 04:55:04 AM
1064 Views
You know...
- 24/08/2010 02:07:04 PM
987 Views
Re: You know...
- 24/08/2010 02:46:16 PM
1157 Views
Okay, that makes better sense.
- 24/08/2010 05:07:56 PM
932 Views
Well, you've seen the books I tend to read and those are unusual in regards to dialogue quality
- 24/08/2010 05:22:10 PM
1051 Views
- 24/08/2010 05:22:10 PM
1051 Views
The only Sanderson I've read is Elantris
- 24/08/2010 11:56:28 AM
982 Views
Elantris is a very poor example of Sanderson's work.
- 24/08/2010 01:59:05 PM
985 Views
A very good review, and thank you.
- 24/08/2010 02:01:05 PM
933 Views
My WoK reaction
- 24/08/2010 03:14:58 PM
1096 Views
I call bullshit on the Erickson comments!
- 24/08/2010 03:34:20 PM
1009 Views
- 24/08/2010 03:34:20 PM
1009 Views
Yes there is a very big difference between the two...
- 24/08/2010 04:58:55 PM
904 Views
And I think that books 5, 6, and 8 are among Erikson's better novels
- 24/08/2010 05:06:43 PM
955 Views
Yes, I wondered why you stopped doing those... you've only posted up to HoC, I believe.
- 24/08/2010 05:22:17 PM
895 Views
Funny, I'd had TtH in mind when referencing Erikson.
- 24/08/2010 05:40:12 PM
888 Views
