Funny, I'd had TtH in mind when referencing Erikson.
Macharius Send a noteboard - 24/08/2010 05:40:12 PM
On reflection, I think the main source of complaints about TtH and EriKson could be dealt with by better editing, rather than trying to change the writing itself.
This message last edited by Macharius on 24/08/2010 at 07:16:48 PM
The Way of Kings - Brief Review
24/08/2010 12:54:39 AM
- 1440 Views
As someone who could not finish Misborn through multiple tries I have to say...
24/08/2010 02:57:01 AM
- 789 Views
I didn't quite have such a positive reaction to the book
24/08/2010 04:55:04 AM
- 864 Views
You know...
24/08/2010 02:07:04 PM
- 780 Views
Re: You know...
24/08/2010 02:46:16 PM
- 932 Views
Okay, that makes better sense.
24/08/2010 05:07:56 PM
- 725 Views
Well, you've seen the books I tend to read and those are unusual in regards to dialogue quality
24/08/2010 05:22:10 PM
- 826 Views

The only Sanderson I've read is Elantris
24/08/2010 11:56:28 AM
- 783 Views
Elantris is a very poor example of Sanderson's work.
24/08/2010 01:59:05 PM
- 766 Views
A very good review, and thank you.
24/08/2010 02:01:05 PM
- 724 Views
My WoK reaction
24/08/2010 03:14:58 PM
- 873 Views
I call bullshit on the Erickson comments!
24/08/2010 03:34:20 PM
- 793 Views

Yes there is a very big difference between the two...
24/08/2010 04:58:55 PM
- 695 Views
And I think that books 5, 6, and 8 are among Erikson's better novels
24/08/2010 05:06:43 PM
- 740 Views
Yes, I wondered why you stopped doing those... you've only posted up to HoC, I believe.
24/08/2010 05:22:17 PM
- 702 Views
Funny, I'd had TtH in mind when referencing Erikson.
24/08/2010 05:40:12 PM
- 697 Views