Active Users:1540 Time:25/12/2025 09:16:22 AM
First, you'd need to know about signifiers and the signified to understand Derrida's position Larry Send a noteboard - 10/09/2010 05:40:22 AM
Derrida argues in defining presence that there is no meaning that exists outside of a text (I'm trying to skirt the signifier/signified issue associated with this). The rest of the phrase quoted argues that this cannot be the case, that there are certain outside factors that influence how the voice/body in singing are perceived by the listening audience.

In other words, there are meanings outside of the "text" (the singing); Derrida's conclusions are wrong.

Help any?
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Someone explain this academic article snippet to me? - 10/09/2010 01:28:05 AM 556 Views
First, you'd need to know about signifiers and the signified to understand Derrida's position - 10/09/2010 05:40:22 AM 457 Views
Actually that helps a bundle. - 10/09/2010 06:05:52 AM 476 Views
Re: First, you'd need to know about signifiers and the signified to understand Derrida's position - 10/09/2010 09:12:41 AM 441 Views
I took it as implied - 10/09/2010 09:26:13 AM 464 Views
Re: I took it as implied - 10/09/2010 09:29:35 AM 497 Views
In literary criticism that is distressingly common. - 10/09/2010 07:16:40 AM 441 Views
Derridean critique of presence - 10/09/2010 09:43:51 AM 457 Views
I prefer Eco's semiotics approach - 10/09/2010 10:08:42 AM 380 Views
Re: I prefer Eco's semiotics approach - 10/09/2010 10:10:26 AM 438 Views
I realize that - 10/09/2010 11:18:07 AM 411 Views
Re: I realize that - 10/09/2010 01:22:49 PM 404 Views

Reply to Message