Active Users:434 Time:18/09/2025 08:37:25 AM
I prefer Eco's semiotics approach Larry Send a noteboard - 10/09/2010 10:08:42 AM
A problem I had when I read Of Grammatology several years ago was precisely that of Speech being nearly-congruous with Thought. It seems to me that this is simplistic and that Thought is but the first level of the codification of stimuli/responses and that is where the issue of Presence might need to be grounded. Just not convinced that Speech is any closer than Writing to Thought.

But that's a topic for another time, perhaps after I re-read a few texts to make sure I'm not misremembering or misunderstanding anything after five years' interval
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Someone explain this academic article snippet to me? - 10/09/2010 01:28:05 AM 512 Views
First, you'd need to know about signifiers and the signified to understand Derrida's position - 10/09/2010 05:40:22 AM 426 Views
Actually that helps a bundle. - 10/09/2010 06:05:52 AM 446 Views
Re: First, you'd need to know about signifiers and the signified to understand Derrida's position - 10/09/2010 09:12:41 AM 409 Views
I took it as implied - 10/09/2010 09:26:13 AM 422 Views
Re: I took it as implied - 10/09/2010 09:29:35 AM 463 Views
In literary criticism that is distressingly common. - 10/09/2010 07:16:40 AM 399 Views
Derridean critique of presence - 10/09/2010 09:43:51 AM 407 Views
I prefer Eco's semiotics approach - 10/09/2010 10:08:42 AM 357 Views
Re: I prefer Eco's semiotics approach - 10/09/2010 10:10:26 AM 408 Views
I realize that - 10/09/2010 11:18:07 AM 379 Views
Re: I realize that - 10/09/2010 01:22:49 PM 374 Views

Reply to Message