Active Users:1573 Time:25/12/2025 08:55:05 AM
I realize that Larry Send a noteboard - 10/09/2010 11:18:07 AM
A problem I had when I read Of Grammatology several years ago was precisely that of Speech being nearly-congruous with Thought. It seems to me that this is simplistic and that Thought is but the first level of the codification of stimuli/responses and that is where the issue of Presence might need to be grounded. Just not convinced that Speech is any closer than Writing to Thought.


You are aware that Derrida is not arguing that it is? Quite the contrary. That is his whole point.

But that's a topic for another time, perhaps after I re-read a few texts to make sure I'm not misremembering or misunderstanding anything after five years' interval :P


But the way you put it, combined with my distant recollections, made me wonder if he was signaling out Speech as being somehow "closer" despite it being the first stage of Writing. A re-read will be the near future, I'm sure.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Someone explain this academic article snippet to me? - 10/09/2010 01:28:05 AM 554 Views
First, you'd need to know about signifiers and the signified to understand Derrida's position - 10/09/2010 05:40:22 AM 456 Views
Actually that helps a bundle. - 10/09/2010 06:05:52 AM 474 Views
Re: First, you'd need to know about signifiers and the signified to understand Derrida's position - 10/09/2010 09:12:41 AM 440 Views
I took it as implied - 10/09/2010 09:26:13 AM 462 Views
Re: I took it as implied - 10/09/2010 09:29:35 AM 495 Views
In literary criticism that is distressingly common. - 10/09/2010 07:16:40 AM 440 Views
Derridean critique of presence - 10/09/2010 09:43:51 AM 455 Views
I prefer Eco's semiotics approach - 10/09/2010 10:08:42 AM 378 Views
Re: I prefer Eco's semiotics approach - 10/09/2010 10:10:26 AM 436 Views
I realize that - 10/09/2010 11:18:07 AM 410 Views
Re: I realize that - 10/09/2010 01:22:49 PM 404 Views

Reply to Message