Active Users:380 Time:01/05/2025 04:50:33 AM
Stranger in a Strange Land imlad Send a noteboard - 02/04/2011 05:37:05 PM
For the book already published before my birth. Since my birth, I have no real clue, since the best stuff I can think of are all parts of series.

Of course, with SiaSL, it HAS to be the uncut edition, no other option there.

I came across <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/mar/28/books-for-the-next-generation">this</a> at the Guardian, and it made me think about things like canonicity for a moment. I figured the best way to get it out of my head would be to turn it into a survey here and make you think about it instead.

I cannot help seeing it as a two-part question.

The question is, if you could only pass on one book to the next generation, which would it be. But I feel there is a difference between books that have already been handed down and given the status of classics, and the books you have come across on your own (to a greater extent) because you were alive when they were published.

So.

If you could only hand on one book that has already been handed on to you, which would it be?

If you had to choose one book among the books published in your lifetime, which would it be?
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
If you could pass on only one book to the next generation, what would it be? - 01/04/2011 10:29:47 AM 1886 Views
good question - 01/04/2011 12:05:20 PM 1397 Views
The Kama Sutra *NM* - 01/04/2011 01:35:42 PM 453 Views
Since you didn't exclude religious books... - 01/04/2011 04:52:56 PM 991 Views
GRRM's SoIaF, maybe they will live long enough to see the series ended - 01/04/2011 07:59:58 PM 1200 Views
You live in hope, I see. - 01/04/2011 08:15:05 PM 939 Views
Norton's Anthology *NM* - 01/04/2011 08:44:18 PM 443 Views
Lord save me. *NM* - 01/04/2011 08:46:13 PM 427 Views
quantiy over quality - 03/04/2011 07:16:13 PM 976 Views
Re: quantiy over quality - 03/04/2011 07:18:13 PM 988 Views
I was mostly pissed that I had to $60 for it and everything we read was available for free - 03/04/2011 11:27:24 PM 925 Views
That is a problem. - 03/04/2011 11:59:28 PM 1058 Views
Volume two hands down - 04/04/2011 02:48:12 PM 876 Views
The first answer is far easier than the second. - 01/04/2011 08:53:30 PM 1011 Views
Someone needs to mention the important stuff - 01/04/2011 09:21:48 PM 1252 Views
I was worried you were going to drag Jordan into this. *NM* - 01/04/2011 09:23:11 PM 416 Views
cookery is important... - 02/04/2011 12:51:16 AM 1264 Views
I'm tempted to say 1984 - 02/04/2011 01:32:22 PM 980 Views
Oooh, good choice. - 02/04/2011 01:33:27 PM 914 Views
I'd go with Brave New World, actually. - 02/04/2011 10:36:20 PM 1084 Views
I think Huxley has a better understanding of human nature and less politcal motive - 03/04/2011 04:48:19 AM 895 Views
I love your opening sentence - 03/04/2011 02:34:45 PM 1028 Views
thank you - 03/04/2011 07:09:35 PM 1024 Views
You'll be interested to know - 03/04/2011 02:33:25 PM 1022 Views
That was very good. - 03/04/2011 02:46:30 PM 1011 Views
Some parts of Orwell's dystopia did in fact come true, though. - 03/04/2011 03:07:07 PM 937 Views
you really need to read Brave New World - 03/04/2011 07:14:04 PM 889 Views
We agree again. *NM* - 03/04/2011 07:45:06 PM 465 Views
stop that your scaring me *NM* - 03/04/2011 11:27:52 PM 406 Views
I can berate you for writing "your" instead of "you're" if it makes you feel better. *NM* - 03/04/2011 11:30:14 PM 403 Views
thats OK I'm good - 04/04/2011 02:49:45 PM 910 Views
Re: thats OK I'm good - 04/04/2011 02:51:34 PM 853 Views
Stranger in a Strange Land - 02/04/2011 05:37:05 PM 894 Views
on second thought - 02/04/2011 05:41:14 PM 997 Views

Reply to Message