How do you think the language compares?
In terms of quality or how complex it is to read? (and this will then have to wait for me to re read a few pages of each - I don't tend to pay that much attention to style in non-fiction). I vaguely remember Castelot's style being more conservative, but not really heavy going.
I enjoy Bertière a lot. She's one of the few historians I buy new books from almost systematically (it would really take a subject I care nothing for to make me skip one). Her latest (?) was a really great biography of Mazarin, probably the best of the four or five I've read so far (and the only one written by a woman). Again, one of her strengths really is to combine good synthesis/analysis with good narrative.
André Castelot - Bonaparte (and on the reviewing of biographies)
05/04/2011 08:54:03 PM
- 534 Views
I think you are right
05/04/2011 10:05:55 PM
- 157 Views
Yeah.
05/04/2011 10:26:42 PM
- 147 Views
Would you say it is still worth reading it?
05/04/2011 10:32:23 PM
- 162 Views
It depends on your background knowledge and/or willingness to look stuff up.
05/04/2011 10:51:46 PM
- 150 Views
Re: Would you say it is still worth reading it?
06/04/2011 01:24:27 PM
- 231 Views
I am a fan of Bertière
06/04/2011 01:37:50 PM
- 141 Views
Re: I am a fan of Bertière
06/04/2011 03:25:31 PM
- 140 Views
Re: I am a fan of Bertière
06/04/2011 03:41:07 PM
- 149 Views
His writing didn't strike me as particularly difficult.
06/04/2011 06:48:05 PM
- 158 Views
Re: His writing didn't strike me as particularly difficult.
06/04/2011 08:09:21 PM
- 150 Views
Re: André Castelot - Bonaparte (and on the reviewing of biographies)
06/04/2011 12:34:31 PM
- 756 Views
I don't see why biographies are more difficult to review than history books generally.
06/04/2011 03:30:37 PM
- 233 Views