Active Users:1842 Time:20/10/2025 05:47:30 AM
There's a lot more to it than that. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 23/01/2012 07:20:30 PM
Writers might have regurgitated elements from Tolkien's works over the years, but they certainly didn't copy his verbose and archaic writing style. And I would argue that there was very little new in his book. It was a collection of myths and legends from ancient cultures, mixed together with different tropes from other cultures, and told in an old style. Compare LotR with other books that came out at the same time and it instantly feels aged.
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
1961 Nobel Finalists: J.R.R. Tolkien - 19/01/2012 09:27:46 AM 1141 Views
It's difficult to assess Tolkien's relative merits then 51 years later. - 19/01/2012 02:41:52 PM 771 Views
Yes, Edwardian prose does not thrill me - 19/01/2012 02:58:00 PM 737 Views
Re: Yes, Edwardian prose does not thrill me - 19/01/2012 03:34:02 PM 600 Views
Re: Yes, Edwardian prose does not thrill me - 19/01/2012 03:45:07 PM 712 Views
Yet Jung personally was contemptuous of Joyce - 19/01/2012 06:41:58 PM 583 Views
Tolkein is an excellent example why I usually dismiss literary critics/critiques - 23/01/2012 05:57:51 PM 846 Views
There's a lot more to it than that. - 23/01/2012 07:20:30 PM 700 Views
True - 23/01/2012 07:57:42 PM 699 Views
You can't dismiss his impact, even if you do not like his storytelling. - 23/01/2012 07:40:19 PM 754 Views
Who is dismissing that he influenced millions well after 1961? - 23/01/2012 07:54:27 PM 695 Views
That's an odd argument - 23/01/2012 07:51:49 PM 782 Views
Not really - 23/01/2012 10:35:39 PM 622 Views
Eh... - 24/01/2012 12:40:37 AM 646 Views
Depends on what you see as the point of literature. - 24/01/2012 08:14:07 AM 604 Views
the point of literature. - 24/01/2012 01:30:28 PM 717 Views
NO - 24/01/2012 02:05:11 PM 586 Views
Re: NO - 25/01/2012 02:54:57 PM 583 Views

Reply to Message