Re: Your comments about the horror make me wonder if you've read the right books.
DomA Send a noteboard - 05/02/2012 05:36:39 PM
A book like, say, It, really can't be described in any other way than horror (and no, I never finished it).
Of course King has lots of books and short stories that are more thriller than horror, and even some that aren't scary at all (such as that short story that was made into Stand By Me). But there are some that definitely are horror.
Of course King has lots of books and short stories that are more thriller than horror, and even some that aren't scary at all (such as that short story that was made into Stand By Me). But there are some that definitely are horror.
I agree. King even kind of invented his own kind of horror literature. He is an expert at turning the most reassuring, mundane or iconic aspects of modern American life to horror, or at pushing social issues to extremes (such as he did in Carrie with religious fundamentalism driven to sheer madness, and aspects of American college/high school life - like the segregation and bullying someone like Carrie would suffer from). With King, modern appliances, pets, toys, cars, baseball, children, fandom, family life, urban legends etc. He created a kind of horror mythology of American (well, East Coast) daily life. All can turn against you, not to mention his more social aspects as in many of his books, American way of life, recent history, ways of thinking and behaving play a huge role for the good, the bad or the plain ugly. He has many flaws as a writer, but he's always been a master at scratching the surface of American life to find material to turn to horror, and to make it work precisely because it's all elements, stories, characters, situations that are extremely close to the readers, often set on an endearing and generally well told background of mundane, endearing reality.
"It" scared the hell of of me as a kid (I read most of the King books I've read between 12 and 15). You must already know this, but it's a good thing you've never finished it - as often with King, the ending didn't live up to the rest of the book, and with this one it was especially disastrous. One recurrent flaw with King is that he is often at loss when judging how much he should explain and how much he should leave open and mysterious. "It" would have been all the more effective if he never gave an answer for what happened. But he did, and the answer was book-destroying.
Though one does wonder if they didn't have sex ed in schools back then...
That's the US, not Europe

Nate reads Stephen King, Part 1: Carrie
05/02/2012 01:07:57 AM
- 1318 Views
Your comments about the horror make me wonder if you've read the right books.
05/02/2012 01:00:44 PM
- 574 Views
Maybe I'm the weird one.
05/02/2012 05:34:42 PM
- 569 Views
Re: Maybe I'm the weird one.
05/02/2012 06:40:06 PM
- 746 Views
Re: Your comments about the horror make me wonder if you've read the right books.
05/02/2012 05:36:39 PM
- 579 Views
I'm interested to see what you think of the evolution of his writing.
13/02/2012 01:06:40 AM
- 732 Views