Active Users:816 Time:16/06/2026 03:58:15 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Runelords DREWRULESWOT! Send a noteboard - 26/09/2009 08:49:32 AM
The first five are good...the third one was a bit weaker, sort of an in-between book, but the others are good. The most recent two, while decent, are nowhere near as good. They stray too far from what made the first (especially the Sum of All Men) four great.
Here's to keeping the spirit of Wotmania alive...cheers to RAFO
Reply to message
/Discussion: David Farland "The RuneLords" or David Edding "The Belgariad" Danu - 26/09/2009 03:19:44 AM 1080 Views
I enjoyed the first three Runelords books. Animosity - 26/09/2009 03:24:30 AM 986 Views
As an Eddings fan from my childhood... Bryce - 26/09/2009 06:50:03 AM 944 Views
I'm quite willing to forgive Eddings for that. Chas - 26/09/2009 03:23:16 PM 857 Views
Runelords DREWRULESWOT! - 26/09/2009 08:49:32 AM 903 Views
Re: /Discussion: David Farland "The RuneLords" or David Edding "The Belgariad" urizen - 26/09/2009 12:50:59 PM 898 Views
Eddings. Chas - 26/09/2009 03:26:38 PM 962 Views
Neither. Werthead - 26/09/2009 06:07:59 PM 1601 Views
Book 2 was not very good, I agree. *NM* Fantasy - 26/09/2009 07:41:58 PM 341 Views
I've read the Runelords Fantasy - 26/09/2009 07:40:05 PM 904 Views
I think... Mossman - 27/09/2009 03:19:59 AM 829 Views
Well I think... Fantasy - 27/09/2009 03:58:14 AM 822 Views
I've read both Ryan - 27/09/2009 07:45:14 AM 894 Views
Runelords Bulgakov - 27/09/2009 03:30:28 PM 889 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes