Active Users:765 Time:30/10/2026 01:32:12 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Runelords DREWRULESWOT! Send a noteboard - 26/09/2009 08:49:32 AM
The first five are good...the third one was a bit weaker, sort of an in-between book, but the others are good. The most recent two, while decent, are nowhere near as good. They stray too far from what made the first (especially the Sum of All Men) four great.
Here's to keeping the spirit of Wotmania alive...cheers to RAFO
Reply to message
/Discussion: David Farland "The RuneLords" or David Edding "The Belgariad" Danu - 26/09/2009 03:19:44 AM 1136 Views
I enjoyed the first three Runelords books. Animosity - 26/09/2009 03:24:30 AM 1048 Views
As an Eddings fan from my childhood... Bryce - 26/09/2009 06:50:03 AM 1000 Views
I'm quite willing to forgive Eddings for that. Chas - 26/09/2009 03:23:16 PM 916 Views
Runelords DREWRULESWOT! - 26/09/2009 08:49:32 AM 958 Views
Re: /Discussion: David Farland "The RuneLords" or David Edding "The Belgariad" urizen - 26/09/2009 12:50:59 PM 956 Views
Eddings. Chas - 26/09/2009 03:26:38 PM 1024 Views
Neither. Werthead - 26/09/2009 06:07:59 PM 1663 Views
Book 2 was not very good, I agree. *NM* Fantasy - 26/09/2009 07:41:58 PM 368 Views
I've read the Runelords Fantasy - 26/09/2009 07:40:05 PM 964 Views
I think... Mossman - 27/09/2009 03:19:59 AM 885 Views
Well I think... Fantasy - 27/09/2009 03:58:14 AM 869 Views
I've read both Ryan - 27/09/2009 07:45:14 AM 960 Views
Runelords Bulgakov - 27/09/2009 03:30:28 PM 945 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes