Active Users:1865 Time:02/05/2026 09:49:22 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Runelords DREWRULESWOT! Send a noteboard - 26/09/2009 08:49:32 AM
The first five are good...the third one was a bit weaker, sort of an in-between book, but the others are good. The most recent two, while decent, are nowhere near as good. They stray too far from what made the first (especially the Sum of All Men) four great.
Here's to keeping the spirit of Wotmania alive...cheers to RAFO
Reply to message
/Discussion: David Farland "The RuneLords" or David Edding "The Belgariad" Danu - 26/09/2009 03:19:44 AM 1055 Views
I enjoyed the first three Runelords books. Animosity - 26/09/2009 03:24:30 AM 968 Views
As an Eddings fan from my childhood... Bryce - 26/09/2009 06:50:03 AM 923 Views
I'm quite willing to forgive Eddings for that. Chas - 26/09/2009 03:23:16 PM 827 Views
Runelords DREWRULESWOT! - 26/09/2009 08:49:32 AM 884 Views
Re: /Discussion: David Farland "The RuneLords" or David Edding "The Belgariad" urizen - 26/09/2009 12:50:59 PM 880 Views
Eddings. Chas - 26/09/2009 03:26:38 PM 942 Views
Neither. Werthead - 26/09/2009 06:07:59 PM 1583 Views
Book 2 was not very good, I agree. *NM* Fantasy - 26/09/2009 07:41:58 PM 330 Views
I've read the Runelords Fantasy - 26/09/2009 07:40:05 PM 887 Views
I think... Mossman - 27/09/2009 03:19:59 AM 806 Views
Well I think... Fantasy - 27/09/2009 03:58:14 AM 802 Views
I've read both Ryan - 27/09/2009 07:45:14 AM 873 Views
Runelords Bulgakov - 27/09/2009 03:30:28 PM 867 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes