Active Users:471 Time:04/05/2025 12:45:24 AM
Neither. Werthead Send a noteboard - 26/09/2009 06:07:59 PM
THE BELGARIAD is a decent YA fantasy series but it's also very childish. I read it when I was 12 or so and enjoyed it as the first epic fantasy I'd ever read. However, if you're much older than that and especially if you've read other, more advanced fantasies such as WHEEL OF TIME or LORD OF THE RINGS, then reading Eddings is seriously dropping down several levels. Some YA fantasy authors such as Rowling and Pullman remain interesting to read as adults, but Eddings does not fit into that bracket.

The first book of RUNELORDS is okay, not brilliant, but not too bad. It has a strong central concept (although it's one partially 'borrowed' from Guy Gavriel Kay's much stronger FIONAVAR TAPESTRY trilogy) and some good moments. Book 2 is absolutely awful, and the later books have been spun out into some horrible and joyless money-making franchise.

So I'd suggest going after something much more interesting to read. There's literally dozens of authors in the fantasy genre who are much better than these two.
Reply to message
/Discussion: David Farland "The RuneLords" or David Edding "The Belgariad" - 26/09/2009 03:19:44 AM 911 Views
I enjoyed the first three Runelords books. - 26/09/2009 03:24:30 AM 837 Views
As an Eddings fan from my childhood... - 26/09/2009 06:50:03 AM 783 Views
I'm quite willing to forgive Eddings for that. - 26/09/2009 03:23:16 PM 691 Views
Runelords - 26/09/2009 08:49:32 AM 751 Views
Eddings. - 26/09/2009 03:26:38 PM 818 Views
Neither. - 26/09/2009 06:07:59 PM 1466 Views
Book 2 was not very good, I agree. *NM* - 26/09/2009 07:41:58 PM 279 Views
I've read the Runelords - 26/09/2009 07:40:05 PM 729 Views
I think... - 27/09/2009 03:19:59 AM 668 Views
Well I think... - 27/09/2009 03:58:14 AM 669 Views
I've read both - 27/09/2009 07:45:14 AM 745 Views
Runelords - 27/09/2009 03:30:28 PM 714 Views

Reply to Message