Active Users:424 Time:25/06/2026 12:04:29 PM
Wellll, I wouldn't call it a "genre," exactly. nossy Send a noteboard - 16/04/2012 09:09:32 PM
I realize that. Some books are popular because they should be. Some are just popular because people find them easy to read. And the author has managed to break into the Walmart bookshelves.

Reply to message
Due to a recent discovery, I have a question to ask. - 14/04/2012 03:15:57 PM 1264 Views
Not really, but I used to be quite keen on Wilbur Smith's Egyptian novels. - 14/04/2012 04:43:22 PM 895 Views
You might like this Rollins fella then. *NM* - 16/04/2012 09:07:02 PM 410 Views
Unless you count John Irving as such... - 14/04/2012 09:39:39 PM 991 Views
Maybe I do? - 16/04/2012 09:07:47 PM 985 Views
That genre is harder to define than you'd think. - 14/04/2012 11:54:32 PM 935 Views
Re: That genre is harder to define than you'd think. - 15/04/2012 05:58:17 PM 1196 Views
Wellll, I wouldn't call it a "genre," exactly. - 16/04/2012 09:09:32 PM 879 Views
From the impression I gather from amazon... - 15/04/2012 12:04:47 AM 921 Views
Re: From the impression I gather from amazon... - 16/04/2012 09:20:19 PM 873 Views
A...store? - 17/04/2012 07:09:38 AM 991 Views
Um, Dan Brown counts right? - 15/04/2012 12:47:47 AM 886 Views
Yes. - 16/04/2012 09:13:42 PM 903 Views
You mean those things hoi polloi read? - 16/04/2012 06:49:31 PM 941 Views
I don't think you did your redneck slang right. - 16/04/2012 09:12:31 PM 969 Views
Wouldn't Harry Potter count? *NM* - 17/04/2012 10:21:43 AM 400 Views
I used to read Tom Clancy, John Grisham, David Baldacci and the like. - 17/04/2012 12:31:03 PM 1034 Views
Especially on vacations. - 17/04/2012 01:03:31 PM 993 Views

Reply to Message