Active Users:658 Time:17/03/2026 07:03:28 PM
I think... Mossman Send a noteboard - 27/09/2009 03:19:59 AM
...you should go with Eddings first. As Wert mentioned, there are many better contemporary series out there, but Eddings is light fun, and though some of his characters start to grate on your nerves by the end of the Mallorean series, many of them are memorable. The first quarter of the first book is clunky, and the narrative voice much too heavy, but it gets better. There are some silly elements, but overall it's worth your time. For me, reading David Eddings is like a pleasant trip down memory lane.

Runelords is just okay. The premise is interesting, the first book was pretty good, the middle two rather lame, and the last one was moderately entertaining. When I finished the series, however, the strongest feeling I had about it was, "In the right hands, this series could have been very good." The world and cultures lack depth, and the characters aren't the least bit memorable. There are bits and pieces that stand out, but not much.
Reply to message
/Discussion: David Farland "The RuneLords" or David Edding "The Belgariad" - 26/09/2009 03:19:44 AM 1037 Views
I enjoyed the first three Runelords books. - 26/09/2009 03:24:30 AM 950 Views
As an Eddings fan from my childhood... - 26/09/2009 06:50:03 AM 907 Views
I'm quite willing to forgive Eddings for that. - 26/09/2009 03:23:16 PM 808 Views
Runelords - 26/09/2009 08:49:32 AM 866 Views
Eddings. - 26/09/2009 03:26:38 PM 926 Views
Neither. - 26/09/2009 06:07:59 PM 1566 Views
Book 2 was not very good, I agree. *NM* - 26/09/2009 07:41:58 PM 324 Views
I've read the Runelords - 26/09/2009 07:40:05 PM 867 Views
I think... - 27/09/2009 03:19:59 AM 791 Views
Well I think... - 27/09/2009 03:58:14 AM 787 Views
I've read both - 27/09/2009 07:45:14 AM 859 Views
Runelords - 27/09/2009 03:30:28 PM 845 Views

Reply to Message