Re: Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here <--- that's ungrammatical!!
temeraire Send a noteboard - 01/06/2012 04:37:56 PM

how is that grammatical for you? i don't know any people who would think that sentence is ok.
"here" has no referent coherent to the sentence - when you take it to mean rafo, the "in america" renders the sentence ungrammatical...because rafo isn't in america, and that makes the sentence disjointed... i'd have said "only by americans is esslemont misspelled here"
"it's like the real world, except there's dragons!"
cw, you are missed...
cw, you are missed...
Why Esselmont is an illiterate, lazy, MORON.
31/05/2012 02:24:16 AM
- 1876 Views
I could point out the irony here.
31/05/2012 03:37:24 AM
- 1019 Views
Re: I could point out the irony here.
31/05/2012 02:10:08 PM
- 808 Views
I did write that at like half three in the morning.
31/05/2012 04:24:29 PM
- 784 Views
Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here
*NM*
01/06/2012 11:42:29 AM
- 679 Views

Re: Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here <--- that's ungrammatical!!
01/06/2012 04:37:56 PM
- 1240 Views
01/06/2012 05:08:06 PM
- 1022 Views


well, in that case your answer for how could be "because of tn native speakers of engish" perhaps...
06/06/2012 03:38:03 AM
- 879 Views
Oh, damn you all.
02/06/2012 04:13:40 AM
- 788 Views