Active Users:537 Time:17/06/2026 01:03:18 AM
58 but I should have only gotten 56. Tom Send a noteboard - 21/01/2013 04:49:56 PM
I was just typing last names so it gave me Richard Adams (I couldn't have named the author of Watership Down in a million years without massive help - i.e., wikipedia) when I thought "Douglas Adams", and it gave me some lady named Susanna Clarke when I thought "Arthur C. Clarke".

Lots of second- and third-rate shit on that list, though. I can't believe they snubbed J.K. Rowling, and Lewis only appeared for that crappy series he wrote that wasn't Narnia, and Lloyd Alexander was missing.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Sporcle quiz: The Top 100 Sci-fi and Fantasy Authors - 20/01/2013 11:11:53 PM 1622 Views
90/100 for me. - 21/01/2013 01:51:59 AM 1231 Views
Same, 90 - 22/01/2013 02:13:07 PM 1244 Views
...I have some reading to do *NM* - 21/01/2013 03:24:57 AM 488 Views
58 but I should have only gotten 56. - 21/01/2013 04:49:56 PM 1065 Views
88, though as Tom and Nate noted, with some luck. - 21/01/2013 06:22:35 PM 1003 Views
forgetting hardly anyone on that list is "unforgiveable" - 21/01/2013 07:30:17 PM 1051 Views
77 - 21/01/2013 07:14:27 PM 1003 Views
97/100 - 21/01/2013 09:00:59 PM 1224 Views
I am to spelling impaired to play but I have read 60 of them - 22/01/2013 12:49:40 AM 1073 Views
93, though I had to cheat for a couple spellings - 22/01/2013 06:23:36 PM 998 Views
JS&MN is a great book, you're missing out. - 23/01/2013 06:56:01 PM 1038 Views
Don't listen to him. It's a horribly boring book. Couldn't finish it *NM* - 24/01/2013 01:46:24 AM 491 Views
Warning duly noted, thanks *NM* - 24/01/2013 01:05:25 PM 471 Views
Re: JS&MN is a great book, you're missing out. - 24/01/2013 01:04:50 PM 1032 Views
Why disturbed? - 24/01/2013 04:16:15 PM 1004 Views
Re: Why disturbed? - 25/01/2013 06:51:26 PM 1009 Views

Reply to Message