Active Users:788 Time:31/01/2026 09:41:03 PM
58 but I should have only gotten 56. Tom Send a noteboard - 21/01/2013 04:49:56 PM
I was just typing last names so it gave me Richard Adams (I couldn't have named the author of Watership Down in a million years without massive help - i.e., wikipedia) when I thought "Douglas Adams", and it gave me some lady named Susanna Clarke when I thought "Arthur C. Clarke".

Lots of second- and third-rate shit on that list, though. I can't believe they snubbed J.K. Rowling, and Lewis only appeared for that crappy series he wrote that wasn't Narnia, and Lloyd Alexander was missing.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Sporcle quiz: The Top 100 Sci-fi and Fantasy Authors - 20/01/2013 11:11:53 PM 1545 Views
90/100 for me. - 21/01/2013 01:51:59 AM 1157 Views
Same, 90 - 22/01/2013 02:13:07 PM 1168 Views
...I have some reading to do *NM* - 21/01/2013 03:24:57 AM 452 Views
58 but I should have only gotten 56. - 21/01/2013 04:49:56 PM 984 Views
88, though as Tom and Nate noted, with some luck. - 21/01/2013 06:22:35 PM 930 Views
forgetting hardly anyone on that list is "unforgiveable" - 21/01/2013 07:30:17 PM 979 Views
77 - 21/01/2013 07:14:27 PM 924 Views
97/100 - 21/01/2013 09:00:59 PM 1138 Views
I am to spelling impaired to play but I have read 60 of them - 22/01/2013 12:49:40 AM 1000 Views
93, though I had to cheat for a couple spellings - 22/01/2013 06:23:36 PM 925 Views
JS&MN is a great book, you're missing out. - 23/01/2013 06:56:01 PM 969 Views
Don't listen to him. It's a horribly boring book. Couldn't finish it *NM* - 24/01/2013 01:46:24 AM 459 Views
Warning duly noted, thanks *NM* - 24/01/2013 01:05:25 PM 434 Views
Re: JS&MN is a great book, you're missing out. - 24/01/2013 01:04:50 PM 939 Views
Why disturbed? - 24/01/2013 04:16:15 PM 921 Views
Re: Why disturbed? - 25/01/2013 06:51:26 PM 932 Views

Reply to Message