There can be combinations of both, but certain groups do pressure writers to "choose sides"
Larry Send a noteboard - 25/05/2014 05:18:52 AM
View original post
Mostly because it 1) debases genre fiction and 2) Provides no incentive for "serious writers" to stretch their imaginations
Mostly because it 1) debases genre fiction and 2) Provides no incentive for "serious writers" to stretch their imaginations
But based on anecdotal evidence, I would say there is some evidence for more "serious writers" utilizing "genre" elements to tell tales that appeal to a wide variety of readers. But yes, there are certain people/groups who think of it as a zero-sum game.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
Brandon Sanderson, Words of Radiance
20/05/2014 01:05:59 AM
- 896 Views
I wonder if Sanderson should never have told people about his "Cosmere"
20/05/2014 04:31:25 PM
- 550 Views
Well, it's relevant to this particular novel
23/05/2014 05:02:47 PM
- 528 Views
I generally assess writers the same way that you do, Larry.
23/05/2014 05:18:24 PM
- 555 Views
Ugh. I hate that. "Creating Literature as an Art Form." vs. "Writing for Entertainment"
24/05/2014 04:21:08 AM
- 540 Views
There can be combinations of both, but certain groups do pressure writers to "choose sides"
25/05/2014 05:18:52 AM
- 508 Views
It also gives "entertainment" writers no incentive to improve their style.
25/05/2014 04:33:23 PM
- 657 Views
I agree
26/05/2014 05:05:18 AM
- 568 Views
"But I assess writers more on their prose and dialogue than I do on their ideas/concepts"
24/05/2014 07:51:15 PM
- 540 Views
Actually, as of two weeks from now, I am
25/05/2014 05:22:04 AM
- 529 Views
You sir, are a snob, plain and simple.
24/05/2014 07:49:02 PM
- 563 Views
Why would I try to defend myself against an ill-supported opinion?
25/05/2014 05:16:35 AM
- 523 Views