Active Users:850 Time:06/11/2026 06:05:00 AM
I have not read Moorcock's rant... LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 03/12/2009 07:17:45 PM
but based on the defense against it, I have a feeling it wasn't the result of a very unbiased honest read. If he came to the conclusions that The Cimmerian refutes...I can't help fut feel he must have gone into it with the intent to negatively criticize.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
The Cimmerian refutes Moorcock's anti-Tolkien rant - 03/12/2009 05:40:47 PM 1665 Views
As a fan of Tolkien, I may be biased. - 03/12/2009 07:02:35 PM 843 Views
I have not read Moorcock's rant... - 03/12/2009 07:17:45 PM 797 Views
How can he assault Tolkien's prose? - 03/12/2009 07:47:25 PM 878 Views
I know, how dare he not default to latin - 03/12/2009 09:03:09 PM 754 Views
I don't think that was an attack... *NM* - 03/12/2009 09:53:15 PM 327 Views
It wasn't. *NM* - 03/12/2009 10:13:56 PM 324 Views
i was being sarcastic - 03/12/2009 11:14:45 PM 781 Views
Pretty much agreed, except I don't think it was a rant. - 04/12/2009 05:22:54 PM 785 Views
I Was Unaware of the Rant As Well As Moorcock's Sympathies With Pullman. - 06/12/2009 12:15:06 PM 1314 Views

Reply to Message