Active Users:1955 Time:27/06/2026 08:44:48 PM
I have not read Moorcock's rant... LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 03/12/2009 07:17:45 PM
but based on the defense against it, I have a feeling it wasn't the result of a very unbiased honest read. If he came to the conclusions that The Cimmerian refutes...I can't help fut feel he must have gone into it with the intent to negatively criticize.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
The Cimmerian refutes Moorcock's anti-Tolkien rant - 03/12/2009 05:40:47 PM 1583 Views
As a fan of Tolkien, I may be biased. - 03/12/2009 07:02:35 PM 763 Views
I have not read Moorcock's rant... - 03/12/2009 07:17:45 PM 716 Views
How can he assault Tolkien's prose? - 03/12/2009 07:47:25 PM 782 Views
I know, how dare he not default to latin - 03/12/2009 09:03:09 PM 684 Views
I don't think that was an attack... *NM* - 03/12/2009 09:53:15 PM 288 Views
It wasn't. *NM* - 03/12/2009 10:13:56 PM 287 Views
i was being sarcastic - 03/12/2009 11:14:45 PM 717 Views
Pretty much agreed, except I don't think it was a rant. - 04/12/2009 05:22:54 PM 712 Views
I Was Unaware of the Rant As Well As Moorcock's Sympathies With Pullman. - 06/12/2009 12:15:06 PM 1205 Views

Reply to Message