Active Users:330 Time:29/04/2024 08:39:18 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I'd tend to agree. Mad Cow Bomber Send a noteboard - 11/12/2009 02:22:14 PM
His early books are LotR knockoffs, but as they go on they deviate more. They improve somewhat, I guess. But yeah, the Word and Void trilogy is better, from what I recall.
"The rent we pay for the little space we occupy on earth is the service we render to others."
Reply to message
Terry Brooks Corporal Crusty - 11/12/2009 04:52:49 AM 767 Views
well, when I was 12 it was great. The Wandering Gambler - 11/12/2009 05:07:53 AM 609 Views
I share your thoughts Dragonsworn - 11/12/2009 02:21:28 PM 734 Views
I'd tend to agree. Mad Cow Bomber - 11/12/2009 02:22:14 PM 649 Views
he's fun if you're reading the book and doing something else... temeraire - 11/12/2009 05:21:41 PM 614 Views
in 1979 I read Sword of Shannara PhotoJim - 11/12/2009 06:47:22 PM 735 Views
I mildly enjoyed The Sword of Shannara. j-whitt987 - 11/12/2009 07:56:16 PM 631 Views
It's one of the few books I abandoned after starting it. aria - 12/12/2009 12:27:17 PM 576 Views
Nostalgia. johnnymack - 12/12/2009 03:40:02 PM 596 Views
They were written thirty years ago, when different standards prevailed. Oh, and for younger readers. lord-of-shadow - 12/12/2009 07:00:32 PM 563 Views
You totally wrote that post just to use the word syzygy. *NM* Ghavrel - 13/12/2009 04:55:20 AM 235 Views
As others have mentioned, they were okay for their time period. Word and Void is a decent series. *NM* Mossman - 12/12/2009 08:26:20 PM 261 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes