You totally wrote that post just to use the word syzygy. *NM*
Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 13/12/2009 04:55:20 AM
Or maybe less sophisticated ones, I suppose (not there that's anything wrong with a less sophisticated read). Either way, most of us are simply not the target audience for them anymore. Time has magnified their flaws, as does our age as readers.
In the right mindset or situation I could see myself enjoying them again, but I generally prefer to read things that don't require syzygy to be enjoyable.
In the right mindset or situation I could see myself enjoying them again, but I generally prefer to read things that don't require syzygy to be enjoyable.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
Terry Brooks
- 11/12/2009 04:52:49 AM
767 Views
They were written thirty years ago, when different standards prevailed. Oh, and for younger readers.
- 12/12/2009 07:00:32 PM
563 Views
You totally wrote that post just to use the word syzygy. *NM*
- 13/12/2009 04:55:20 AM
236 Views
As others have mentioned, they were okay for their time period. Word and Void is a decent series. *NM*
- 12/12/2009 08:26:20 PM
261 Views