Active Users:402 Time:01/05/2025 08:34:49 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Absolutely. Except it's not something I *don't* like, as such. Perdita Send a noteboard - 02/09/2009 08:28:11 PM
You know what I didn't like about Abercrombie's First Law Trilogy? The very same thing that made it great. I loved that it was so un-traditional, that the good people didn't always win.

...but the good people never won. I can't think of anyone who got anything good out of it, except maybe Glokta, who lost all coolness for me when he disemboweled that innocent dude. And Bayaz, who turned out not to be cool after all.

Thoughts?


Because the Good Guys pulling out in front at the end and winning is a complete epic fantasy trope, and although I felt a bit hollow and woeful at the end, I respect him for doing it. It was still entertaining and effective. Ballsy thing to do and a risk for the publishing house too really.
Reply to message
(spoiler) First Law Trilogy rebelaessedai - 02/09/2009 07:41:06 PM 768 Views
well, that's the point... kcf - 02/09/2009 07:43:58 PM 589 Views
"The life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." Haggard - 02/09/2009 09:00:26 PM 649 Views
So you don't feel... rebelaessedai - 03/09/2009 06:40:00 PM 715 Views
not really kcf - 03/09/2009 09:46:38 PM 620 Views
I can see that, to an extent. rebelaessedai - 04/09/2009 03:48:26 PM 755 Views
I definitely agree. Mad Cow Bomber - 02/09/2009 07:45:58 PM 703 Views
Yeah, there's that too. rebelaessedai - 03/09/2009 06:39:18 PM 685 Views
Absolutely. Except it's not something I *don't* like, as such. Perdita - 02/09/2009 08:28:11 PM 769 Views
Well, yeah. rebelaessedai - 03/09/2009 06:37:37 PM 621 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes