Active Users:804 Time:01/11/2026 04:39:55 PM
I normally would agree with you LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 14/02/2010 06:05:36 PM
But the thing about harry potter is that it gradually got darker, deeper and in a lot of ways better. It carried kids through a simple fun story and matured with them.

I've seen much the opposite with Twilight. IMO, it has a dumbing effect. I'm not saying people who don't read and then read Twilight will not go and read some more...but their tastes and opinions of books will forever be tarnished. I could easily see someone who started reading with Twilight scoff at reading LotR or even (maybe particularly) Harry Potter. Furthermore, what's a step up from Twilight? If you're some young unthinking mob-member of the Twilight Fan Club, the only place you're going to find book you enjoy is trashy romance novels. Not that trashy romance novels don't have their place, but they're hardly examples of outstanding literature. An actual fantasy or sci-fi novel might prompt one of these fangirls to think (Meyer forbid :P).

I'm not saying that's ALL Twilight readers...just the kind I hate :P

Heh. It just occurred to me Meyer is also a type of lemon. ha ha.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
As I don't believe we've actually had a review of this yet... Stephenie Meyer's Twilight series. - 14/02/2010 04:08:51 PM 1739 Views
I think the series is codswallop...and that it DID have potential - 14/02/2010 04:59:56 PM 1092 Views
As I said, the second book is better in some regards thanks to that. - 14/02/2010 05:06:29 PM 1188 Views
I normally would agree with you - 14/02/2010 06:05:36 PM 1015 Views
Re: I normally would agree with you - 15/02/2010 10:10:01 PM 933 Views
Re: Hey, I liked the Backstreet Boys. They sang me into puberty! - 14/02/2010 05:53:36 PM 955 Views
Re: I'm going to be very unkind and possibly factually wrong here, since it has been a while. - 14/02/2010 05:52:52 PM 1106 Views
Yeah, absolutely true (spoilers). - 14/02/2010 06:14:58 PM 1082 Views
maybe not anti-feminist... - 14/02/2010 06:21:44 PM 1194 Views
Re: I think it gets labelled antifeminist because, well, it's Bella, the heroine, and she's so young - 14/02/2010 06:26:37 PM 1274 Views
I love your point about the other "Strong women" - 14/02/2010 06:43:05 PM 1096 Views
Re: What is LDS? *NM* - 14/02/2010 06:44:36 PM 431 Views
Probably, but that doesn't make them right. - 14/02/2010 07:11:19 PM 1233 Views
Re: The point I was trying to make there, to some extent... - 14/02/2010 07:20:36 PM 982 Views
precisely - 14/02/2010 06:17:18 PM 1003 Views
They lost me with twinkly vampires *NM* - 14/02/2010 09:22:01 PM 557 Views
I think it could have been sold better - 14/02/2010 09:35:07 PM 992 Views
Vampires should be tragic at best monsters at worst - 15/02/2010 04:58:15 PM 1045 Views
I thought that was strange too - 15/02/2010 09:19:26 PM 986 Views
I think I would rather just eat people then be stuck in high school forever - 16/02/2010 09:22:07 PM 1057 Views
You just had to do it, didn't you? *possible spoiler* - 15/02/2010 01:57:29 AM 1335 Views
yes *spoilers* - 15/02/2010 02:02:27 AM 1083 Views
You haven't even read that book! *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:50:49 AM 445 Views
I've read more about it than I've cared to. *NM* - 15/02/2010 09:20:07 PM 416 Views
Yeah. It's one of those things that sound worse out of context than they are in the book itself... - 15/02/2010 10:57:47 AM 1047 Views
Re: Monster Demon Baby! - 15/02/2010 12:56:39 PM 1021 Views
Wow, dude. Just. Wow. *NM* - 16/02/2010 02:29:31 AM 428 Views
Great way to label this series... - 26/02/2010 07:40:47 PM 1152 Views
I read a lot of PNR (paranormal romance for you book snobs out there) and thus have read these too. - 15/02/2010 09:55:54 PM 1074 Views
I totally agree about book four. - 15/02/2010 10:02:43 PM 978 Views
Mormon fantasy...haha - 15/02/2010 10:06:58 PM 1460 Views
*lmao* There are gay men who like Edward? - 15/02/2010 10:12:37 PM 1164 Views
Re: *lmao* There are gay men who like Edward? - 15/02/2010 10:16:32 PM 1052 Views

Reply to Message