Active Users:1559 Time:26/08/2025 05:34:31 AM
Yes. Cockatiel of Doom Send a noteboard - 17/03/2010 05:01:31 PM

The Ackroyd book, wasn't it?


It was.

I haven't read Bayard's take on that.


He does a similar thing. Murderer as named in the story is not actual murderer, etc. I thought it was fun, even if it was hard to take seriously.


He loses me when he start talking about independent action from characters and deep animosity on the part of the author, but his theory otherwise is sound.


I had trouble with the whole "author does not know what his characters are really doing" type of thing. Bit odd. But interesting all the same.
Taking a break from being Ella

Reply to message
Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 05:20:09 AM 880 Views
Re: Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 09:12:23 AM 702 Views
I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 12/03/2010 11:55:09 PM 628 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 14/03/2010 10:56:54 AM 696 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:37:35 PM 674 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:39:13 PM 648 Views
Yes. - 17/03/2010 05:01:31 PM 692 Views
Re: Yes. - 17/03/2010 07:53:38 PM 582 Views
I don't mind either way. - 12/03/2010 10:18:03 AM 680 Views
Your face is an unreliable horse! - 12/03/2010 10:25:32 AM 681 Views
I think it's fairly logical that genre fiction doesn't employ it as often. - 12/03/2010 01:21:06 PM 847 Views
Well, isn't Erikson notable for his unreliable POVs? - 14/03/2010 12:57:25 AM 679 Views
Hm. Yeigh? - 12/03/2010 05:15:41 PM 749 Views
I like it when they are well written - 15/03/2010 08:44:02 AM 963 Views
Like anything else it is good when done right - 15/03/2010 10:32:48 PM 764 Views
I think because of our cynical nature - 19/03/2010 06:58:05 AM 650 Views

Reply to Message