So the question is: If a a soldier is dishonorably discharged (as DADT dictates), is that individual still bound by military regulations for veterans?
If I understand DADT correctly the discharge is a general discharge under other than honorable conditions.
Civilians shorten that to 'Dishonorable Discharge' but that's not accurate. They aren't the same classification.
General discharges are for lots of different things. For instance, a person who joins the military but flunks basic used to be given a general discharge. Eventually the military realized that the civvies couldn't keep that straight from a dishonorable discharge and changed the policy so that they weren't 'discharged' at all - just kind of written off as though they had never joined up.
Dishonorable discharges are for those folks who have committed crimes and been kicked out of the military. Stealing, rape, robbing banks, desertion, that kind of thing.
General Discharge under other than honorable conditions are sort of administrative discharges. DADT falls under this category. It does still deny you your benefits etc. and is still generally seen as leaving under a cloud but it's not actually dishonorable.
And of course an Honorable Discharge is 'You completed your term of service and were discharged at the end having done your duty.' Full benefits etc. apply.
Most civilians, as I said, don't really get the distinction and think that there are only two.
As to the regs - I've never heard of them actually being enforced on someone who is no longer part of the military. It's probably happened, but I've never heard of it. So I don't honestly know.
May God stand between you and harm in all the empty places you must walk.
Old Egyptian Blessing
Old Egyptian Blessing
I'm in favor of repealing DADT, but this made me briefly reconsider
- 21/04/2010 05:29:45 AM
1503 Views
...did you read the article? They aren't in the military any more. *NM*
- 21/04/2010 05:31:02 AM
454 Views
Really? A few months ago Lt. Choi was still in the military, I didn't realize he'd been discharged
- 21/04/2010 05:37:47 AM
986 Views
No, in or out it's a no-go
- 21/04/2010 05:48:25 AM
995 Views
There needs to be a rule that stops soldiers from wearing uniforms in bars
- 21/04/2010 06:55:37 AM
943 Views
Grabbing a beer with the guys after work is a pretty normal thing
- 21/04/2010 07:45:16 AM
931 Views
I've seen it.
- 21/04/2010 12:52:59 PM
923 Views
Not a very fair way to look at it
- 21/04/2010 02:10:47 PM
969 Views
perhaps not on its own
- 21/04/2010 07:06:09 PM
890 Views
Sadly that's not that uncommon
- 21/04/2010 07:27:45 PM
1004 Views
to be honest, I've probably met plenty of wonderful military people in the bars
- 21/04/2010 07:41:30 PM
986 Views
every think the problem might be the uptight college kids? *NM*
- 22/04/2010 05:10:08 PM
400 Views
Excepting possibly finals period, I'm pretty sure "uptight college kid" is an oxymoron. *NM*
- 22/04/2010 07:07:58 PM
417 Views
uptight college kids don't go drink in Aggieville.
- 22/04/2010 07:17:17 PM
1155 Views
The navy and Marine do have rules against it at least for working uniforms
- 21/04/2010 04:06:10 PM
970 Views
Like Buzz Aldrin wearing his on Dancing with the Stars. Ugh. *NM*
- 21/04/2010 02:37:59 PM
426 Views
well that was an air force uniform so it really doesn't count as military
- 21/04/2010 04:00:27 PM
1102 Views
- 21/04/2010 04:00:27 PM
1102 Views
I'll remind you of that next time you want air support ;-)
- 21/04/2010 06:00:32 PM
977 Views
I am a Marine we have our own air support
- 21/04/2010 06:15:01 PM
881 Views
- 21/04/2010 06:15:01 PM
881 Views
Yeah - some of it pretty good too but still all small stuff
- 21/04/2010 07:26:12 PM
935 Views
The F/A18 does OK
- 21/04/2010 10:11:13 PM
846 Views
It's all right, but not the best choice
- 22/04/2010 04:30:07 PM
921 Views
Hm. That seems to violate some significant 1st Amendment rights.
- 21/04/2010 07:00:59 PM
926 Views
you forget that the military sign away their rights. *NM*
- 21/04/2010 07:06:52 PM
439 Views
That's why I specified dishonorably discharged. They're no longer in the military.
- 21/04/2010 08:43:22 PM
938 Views
*shrug* sorry, I'm a bit cynical over how much the military EVER lets go.
- 21/04/2010 10:13:51 PM
899 Views
Re: I'm in favor of repealing DADT, but this made me briefly reconsider
- 21/04/2010 05:36:48 AM
944 Views
Not in uniform.
- 21/04/2010 05:38:50 AM
1063 Views
oh puhlease
- 21/04/2010 05:43:15 AM
1005 Views
It's not a just a piece of clothing, but I guess we'll agree to disagree on that.
- 21/04/2010 05:45:52 AM
987 Views
and another thing
- 21/04/2010 05:38:53 AM
989 Views
I'm on their side, BUT
- 21/04/2010 05:44:00 AM
930 Views
Well... it's a military policy. If they were protesting animal cruelty while wearing it, I'd agree
- 21/04/2010 06:53:36 AM
1150 Views
What beetnemesis said. They're not talking about rights for all gays, but rights for gay soldiers.
- 21/04/2010 09:54:09 AM
896 Views
It's peaceful and non-violent. I see nothing wrong with them making their point in this in addition
- 21/04/2010 02:12:54 PM
898 Views
A soldier protesting a military doctrine has the right.
- 21/04/2010 02:28:40 PM
1040 Views
they don't have the right to use the uniform to make that free expression *NM*
- 21/04/2010 02:39:45 PM
397 Views
Take it up with congress, the regulations are clear, no such right exists, it is expressly banned *NM*
- 21/04/2010 02:46:14 PM
369 Views
The uniform isn't just handed to you after Basic with no strings attached.
- 21/04/2010 03:04:32 PM
1028 Views
The funny thing about it is
- 21/04/2010 03:35:51 PM
1045 Views
Re: The funny thing about it is
- 21/04/2010 10:12:57 PM
893 Views
Actually -the question isn't right
- 22/04/2010 04:38:03 PM
802 Views
I think your attitude is likely to be common among active duty and vets alike.
- 21/04/2010 02:44:29 PM
920 Views
Actually, darlin', we don't have to convince them.
- 21/04/2010 03:34:49 PM
918 Views
very true
- 21/04/2010 03:51:49 PM
972 Views
But these men didn't disrespect anything.
- 21/04/2010 04:09:20 PM
1004 Views
the problem is uniforms are about more than everyone dressing the same
- 21/04/2010 05:55:31 PM
977 Views
The statistics show that nearly 70% of Americans think gay men and women should serve openly.
- 21/04/2010 04:14:33 PM
879 Views
And going back to the Truman example, he doesn't even have to show Truman's courage.
- 21/04/2010 04:17:02 PM
931 Views
Re: And going back to the Truman example, he doesn't even have to show Truman's courage.
- 21/04/2010 04:25:46 PM
946 Views
That dude is all talk about everything.
- 21/04/2010 04:27:07 PM
1058 Views
Well he wasn't all talk about Health care
- 22/04/2010 04:44:39 PM
1023 Views
Yes, the main thing he has followed through on is the most disastrous.
- 22/04/2010 04:59:45 PM
793 Views
Civil disobedience against immoral government action often involves breaking the rules. *NM*
- 21/04/2010 03:37:36 PM
437 Views
Wow,
- 21/04/2010 04:04:42 PM
902 Views
I'm sure female protesters made a lot of people reconsider the suffrage movement.
- 21/04/2010 04:09:37 PM
1070 Views
The bravey of those men is exactly what that 'clothing' stands for.
- 21/04/2010 04:20:19 PM
1005 Views