it's a message from the Queen!
The rest of it is meh, considering divergent grammatical conventions for the most part.
One reason I like Romance languages is that their grammatical structures reminds me of certain Southern grammatical rules, ones that make much more sense than British or Yank ones.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
From David Mitchell: Dear America
- 20/05/2010 03:16:38 PM
869 Views
As a non-native Eng-spleaking person...
- 20/05/2010 03:32:14 PM
551 Views
"Could care less is" a personal peeve of mine, too.
- 20/05/2010 03:43:08 PM
542 Views
Mine also
- 20/05/2010 04:08:23 PM
680 Views
Oh, and for the record: the use of "table" as a verb in politics still confuses me for about 5 sec.
- 20/05/2010 04:38:35 PM
584 Views
What a grating accent
- 20/05/2010 10:41:38 PM
541 Views
- 20/05/2010 10:41:38 PM
541 Views
what grammatical conventions?
- 20/05/2010 11:11:10 PM
509 Views
Subjunctive, reflective pronouns, things like that
- 20/05/2010 11:26:09 PM
528 Views
His main two points had nothing to do with all that, though...
- 20/05/2010 11:39:28 PM
641 Views
I know. I just merely said I disliked the accent and that the divergent dialects were just that
- 20/05/2010 11:59:25 PM
563 Views
How does that apply at all?
- 20/05/2010 11:43:49 PM
529 Views
Different rules for different dialects
- 21/05/2010 12:03:31 AM
658 Views
.... dialects?
- 21/05/2010 12:06:03 AM
619 Views
Yes, dialects
- 21/05/2010 12:20:09 AM
619 Views
Re: Yes, dialects
- 21/05/2010 12:24:25 AM
501 Views
Perhaps
- 21/05/2010 12:54:49 AM
593 Views
Re: Perhaps
- 21/05/2010 12:56:18 AM
528 Views
It really depends
- 21/05/2010 01:03:13 AM
707 Views
Re: It really depends
- 21/05/2010 01:05:21 AM
657 Views

*NM*
*NM*