mm. well I don't much like that either, to be honest.
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 24/05/2010 03:00:29 PM
We wouldn't be limiting ourselves to conventional weapons at that point. Tactical nuclear shells from artillery comes to mind. Note that the US recently refused to rule out the use of nuclear weapons against North Korea when it said that it would never use nuclear weapons except in defense against nations that were parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
It would be more efficient, and on practicality I could probably stand behind it. On the other hand, that's an obscene loss of life of people who are likely not responsible for their government's actions.
Unless I'm misunderstanding the scope of damage from a tactical nuclear shell. I'm thinking along the lines of the WWII bombs, but if these aren't as devastating then that's something different. If we could locally wipe out mostly-military areas that way without devastating too much of the surrounding land and people, that would be awesome
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Oh, by the way...has anyone noticed how close the Korean peninsula is to war?
24/05/2010 02:04:12 PM
- 1096 Views
I was wondering when something would be posted about this
24/05/2010 02:49:54 PM
- 790 Views

But does North Korea really listen to China that much anymore?
24/05/2010 02:55:04 PM
- 733 Views
that might well be a good point
24/05/2010 03:20:32 PM
- 702 Views
The explaination I have heard...
24/05/2010 09:05:40 PM
- 738 Views
Kim made one of his rare trips outside of North Korea about two weeks ago.
26/05/2010 07:49:18 AM
- 688 Views
yah, it doesn't look to be a good situation
24/05/2010 02:50:08 PM
- 704 Views
If there were a war with North Korea the US has the resources to deal with it.
24/05/2010 02:56:39 PM
- 725 Views
mm. well I don't much like that either, to be honest.
24/05/2010 03:00:29 PM
- 716 Views
Still scary and you know that using those would escalate everything.
24/05/2010 03:26:12 PM
- 673 Views
Korea is directly in our sphere of influence
24/05/2010 03:37:18 PM
- 628 Views
I meant "we" in a personal sense, not a national sense.
24/05/2010 05:36:40 PM
- 778 Views
In a personal sense, we could hijack a nuclear silo and shoot an ICBM at Pyongyang.
24/05/2010 05:50:52 PM
- 602 Views

That would totally blow my cover of being a nerdy little grandma.
24/05/2010 09:37:28 PM
- 623 Views
A part of me says just get it over with
24/05/2010 03:21:06 PM
- 615 Views
I agree that if war is inevitable, it is much better to start it at a time of our choosing.
24/05/2010 03:48:36 PM
- 767 Views
I'm trying not to. *NM*
24/05/2010 05:25:06 PM
- 252 Views
I try to block it out with thought's of a puppet singing "I'm So Ronery". *NM*
24/05/2010 10:59:23 PM
- 265 Views
No one wants to resume the Korean War.
24/05/2010 11:27:12 PM
- 741 Views
China does.
25/05/2010 12:29:11 AM
- 680 Views
No, they don't
25/05/2010 12:54:49 AM
- 705 Views
Well, it would be more accurate to say they want a conflict, yes.
25/05/2010 01:15:23 AM
- 704 Views
No, they don't
25/05/2010 01:24:17 AM
- 688 Views
I'm saying the Cold War isn't over, since it was never about capitalism vs. communism to begin.
25/05/2010 01:41:28 AM
- 730 Views
North Korea is not acting suicidal? Are you kidding?
25/05/2010 02:41:29 AM
- 658 Views
The internal political dynamic in North Korea is such that they constantly need a crisis.
25/05/2010 03:03:59 AM
- 676 Views
You are missing the main point.
25/05/2010 03:36:37 AM
- 720 Views
I'm not saying it's nothing new.
25/05/2010 03:57:40 AM
- 696 Views
Your response highlights the ultimate problem: the crisis will have to keep getting bigger.
25/05/2010 07:44:19 PM
- 636 Views
Yes, I've been watching with morbid curiosity and a little sick feeling in my stomach.
25/05/2010 02:47:53 AM
- 735 Views