I actually DO feel like taking a course on number theory.
Joel Send a noteboard - 25/05/2010 12:12:10 PM
In fact, my HS Honors Algebra teacher suggested it. He also baptized me, but that was about ten years later.
Unfortunately I'm a bit put off by the notation and nomenclature, and, though I could be mistaken, it requires at least a little of the calc knowledge I lack. And yet calc strikes me as some of the most interesting math because it's not just manipulating numbers, there's actual THOUGHT involved.
Speaking of which, I get all you were saying here; I KNOW it's not a mystical magical miracle--but that tells me what it ISN'T, not what it is. Like I said, 2 isn't "spooky" because adding it to itself, or multiplying it, or even raising it to its own power give the same result, it's just that all those things are, in this particular case, the same operation: You're putting two things with two other things, and that means there's four of them, because that's just how counting works. My problem here is I'm UNABLE to explain 7 that way, and it bothers me. And the more I look at it, the freakier it gets, like with the (22/7)^2~10 thing. I mean, seriously, "if leading zeros are not permitted on numerals, then 142857 is the only cyclic number in decimal"?!!! What kind of twisted crap is that?

Speaking of which, I get all you were saying here; I KNOW it's not a mystical magical miracle--but that tells me what it ISN'T, not what it is. Like I said, 2 isn't "spooky" because adding it to itself, or multiplying it, or even raising it to its own power give the same result, it's just that all those things are, in this particular case, the same operation: You're putting two things with two other things, and that means there's four of them, because that's just how counting works. My problem here is I'm UNABLE to explain 7 that way, and it bothers me. And the more I look at it, the freakier it gets, like with the (22/7)^2~10 thing. I mean, seriously, "if leading zeros are not permitted on numerals, then 142857 is the only cyclic number in decimal"?!!! What kind of twisted crap is that?

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Continuing the Math Theme, WTF Is Up with the Seven?
25/05/2010 02:12:09 AM
- 650 Views
25/05/2010 08:19:12 AM
- 481 Views
Number theory holds a concept called "cyclic numbers."
25/05/2010 06:04:43 AM
- 540 Views
"If leading zeros are not permitted on numerals, then 142857 is the only cyclic number in decimal. "
25/05/2010 06:27:36 AM
- 545 Views

Happy Birthday...?
25/05/2010 08:56:59 AM
- 415 Views

You're a day early
25/05/2010 09:10:30 AM
- 430 Views

Got me on a technicality.
25/05/2010 09:19:54 AM
- 331 Views
Re: Got me on a technicality.
25/05/2010 09:27:59 AM
- 370 Views
But we're AWESOME!
25/05/2010 09:47:30 AM
- 471 Views
25/05/2010 09:50:43 AM
- 348 Views

Number THEORY is great fun, but too many folks make math too tedious, I'm afraid.
25/05/2010 09:53:21 AM
- 386 Views

You tend to get cyclic repeats when dividing by primes
25/05/2010 11:58:34 AM
- 564 Views
I actually DO feel like taking a course on number theory.
25/05/2010 12:12:10 PM
- 523 Views
Re: I actually DO feel like taking a course on number theory.
25/05/2010 01:46:10 PM
- 365 Views
Well, I'm not vouching for Wikipedias claim, just reiterating it.
25/05/2010 02:35:23 PM
- 581 Views
It's usually right but I wouldn't but much value on the implied importance
25/05/2010 04:22:52 PM
- 426 Views
If you say so; I really try hard not to channel Pythagoras.
26/05/2010 09:26:22 AM
- 595 Views

Re: If you say so; I really try hard not to channel Pythagoras.
26/05/2010 10:00:37 AM
- 542 Views
