Obviously, this is a bit of a challenge since Wotmania is no more, but to refresh your memory, I stopped supporting Bush in 2003 when he pushed through that financial disaster called Medicare Part D.....FLUSH goes our money.
I can respect that from you, and understand, but Faux "News" and their ilk didn't leave themselves that luxury; they were utterly silent on mounting deficits that whole time. It's kind of odd for an outfit that turned a blind eye to 1/3 of the current deficit to ominously warn that it's "90% of the annual GDP. " It's certainly hypocritical for them to lay all the blame on Obama when at least half of the deficit growth in the year and a half since he took over was following up on a Wall Street bailout begun by their beloved W (but then, they had no trouble bashing Obama for it a year after lauding Bush for it either. ) Even the bill they're attacking is one whose principal aims they support, they just don't like how Obama and Congressional Dems are going about it (shades of John Kerry.


That makes it clear this isn't so much "news" as "editorial" (from FOX?!!! NO!!! *faints dead away* ) Also makes it hard to take their doom and gloom seriously; since they have partisan reasons for spouting it I'm willing to wait and see what happens, at least for another year or two. By then it'll be Presidential election season and we can have a referendum on it.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
US Debt Hits $13T - But Spending Spree in DC Continues.....
26/05/2010 05:09:48 PM
- 1039 Views

Look who finally remembered they oppose federal deficits.
26/05/2010 05:26:30 PM
- 656 Views
Silly Joel.....please find the posts where I supported GWB's deficit spending.
26/05/2010 05:35:13 PM
- 712 Views
hmmm
26/05/2010 05:40:49 PM
- 649 Views
That's different; spending trillions on the Iraq war is necessary national defense, just ask Fox.
26/05/2010 05:46:49 PM
- 857 Views
0.7 Trillion doesn't usually qualify as 'Trillions'
26/05/2010 06:16:15 PM
- 804 Views
I'm not willing to try parsing how much DoD spending was and wasn't Iraq just now.
26/05/2010 06:27:50 PM
- 771 Views
You can knock off the "Faux News" stuff, makes you sound like you've been hanging at Daily Kos
26/05/2010 07:06:16 PM
- 832 Views
A Fox News person was involved in writing the article so it sent him into a tissy fit
26/05/2010 10:56:35 PM
- 624 Views
Well, they annoyed the hell out of me by "accusing" Dems of something they supported for 5 years.
27/05/2010 03:30:08 PM
- 856 Views
This would sound better if you didn't say yourself the support was mostly fake
28/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
- 846 Views
I thought overthrowing Saddam was fine.....and it worked out very well.
26/05/2010 06:37:31 PM
- 635 Views
"They" plural.
26/05/2010 05:45:48 PM
- 876 Views
you are so full of crap
26/05/2010 05:59:47 PM
- 682 Views
Oh, they weren't silent; they were quite vocal in their endorsement of the Iraq war.
26/05/2010 06:03:51 PM
- 920 Views
more ranting doesn't support your argument
26/05/2010 06:17:22 PM
- 836 Views
I'll respond to the coherent part of that.
26/05/2010 06:30:07 PM
- 852 Views

I wish ...
26/05/2010 06:57:30 PM
- 858 Views
Is the NYT any better pieces slandering McCain and his wife before an election?
26/05/2010 07:16:58 PM
- 700 Views
I don't know those articles specifically.
26/05/2010 08:27:44 PM
- 763 Views
So my repeated use of "M$" in moondogs thread only makes things worse?
27/05/2010 03:35:06 PM
- 749 Views

You mean you will repsond to part that you like and ignore the part you don't because of a typo
26/05/2010 07:18:03 PM
- 770 Views
I'll give Joel a little hand here...
26/05/2010 09:14:27 PM
- 861 Views
The second paragraph is very hard to follow unless you already have an idea what he's going to say.
27/05/2010 03:43:09 PM
- 787 Views
yes the good republicans spent a lot of money so democrats should spend even more argument
26/05/2010 05:52:57 PM
- 614 Views
Well, I'll certainly agree that if it's bad, it's bad whoever's doing it.
26/05/2010 06:00:20 PM
- 824 Views
you are attacking Fox News becuase you object to opposing views being expressed
26/05/2010 06:27:29 PM
- 823 Views
Not at all; I just expect a little consistency.
26/05/2010 06:40:07 PM
- 856 Views
then why not show some and admit that all the news agency were backing the war
26/05/2010 07:10:57 PM
- 831 Views
Yes, they were; most of them stopped: One of them didn't.
27/05/2010 03:08:34 PM
- 805 Views
so the other media outlets get a pass because the supported losing a war they supported starting?
27/05/2010 06:39:21 PM
- 668 Views
We were heading in the wrong direction already, but Obama/Dems put the pedal to the floor...
26/05/2010 06:41:48 PM
- 623 Views
I don't mean to defend all of the spending that Obama and Congress have done since he's in power...
26/05/2010 09:29:38 PM
- 802 Views
They did push the pedal further down even if they didn't start it
26/05/2010 10:46:38 PM
- 842 Views
Here is the problem with this kind of reporting...
27/05/2010 07:12:34 AM
- 756 Views
The problem with that kind of logic is it is wrong
27/05/2010 02:19:37 PM
- 657 Views
Yes, that would be wrong.
27/05/2010 03:35:30 PM
- 672 Views
Based on Obama's budget, he will add more to the debt over the next 10 years.....
27/05/2010 04:10:45 PM
- 591 Views
At least we agree that you are wrong because that is what you said
27/05/2010 06:50:43 PM
- 611 Views
And where does the rest of the money come from?
27/05/2010 08:12:31 PM
- 759 Views
No, that's for the entire Department of Defense.
27/05/2010 08:25:28 PM
- 654 Views
using those numbers the war appears to be about half a drop in the bucket *NM*
27/05/2010 08:37:31 PM
- 339 Views