Active Users:848 Time:30/09/2026 07:13:33 AM
These days I typically just say, "Fox. " Joel Send a noteboard - 27/05/2010 03:48:40 PM
Kerry got crap for saying he voted for the bill before he voted against it and for saying if you wanted to know what kind of leader he would be ask the people he served with knowing that many of them opposed him.

I hate to speak out against your faith but it was Fox was hardly alone in not being critical of the war before it began. They did have a number of anchors who supported finishing and who supported the surge when those on the left were saying we should cut and run and screaming that the surge was never work. Funny how much criticism Fox gets for right about and how much chest thumping the left continues to do about being wrong.

Indeed, as I noted above, Kerry got crap for saying he voted for the bill before he voted against it, because he only changed his vote when Republicans started tacking on a whole bunch of pork that didn't help the troops at all. No one wanted to hear it in '04, least of all Faux, so I don't know why they suddenly care now. Apart from partisan bias, of course.


... that people would quit with the mock-names, like "Faux News". It always, 100% of the time, immediately gives me the sense that the writer has no credibility. If you want to make a point, or write persuasively for one side or another of a given debate, please, for the love of god, just call them Fox News. That's their name. And no, as a news writer myself, I don't like how they do things either.

Because I realize the derisive term is inflammatory and thus counterproductive. This time they reminded me why I used to use it exclusively. I will NOT call them "news" because I consider that defamation of journalism. They're an international editorial corporation that occasionally, incidentally, reports some actual news more to salvage some of THEIR credibility than for any other reason. And usually has to spin even that. They're the GOPs answer to Pravda, and while they may give the weather every day, that doesn't make them a "news source. "
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
US Debt Hits $13T - But Spending Spree in DC Continues..... - 26/05/2010 05:09:48 PM 1223 Views
Look who finally remembered they oppose federal deficits. - 26/05/2010 05:26:30 PM 817 Views
Silly Joel.....please find the posts where I supported GWB's deficit spending. - 26/05/2010 05:35:13 PM 890 Views
hmmm - 26/05/2010 05:40:49 PM 813 Views
I thought overthrowing Saddam was fine.....and it worked out very well. - 26/05/2010 06:37:31 PM 781 Views
I'll take what comfort I can from this. - 26/05/2010 06:45:53 PM 889 Views
"They" plural. - 26/05/2010 05:45:48 PM 1055 Views
you are so full of crap - 26/05/2010 05:59:47 PM 856 Views
Oh, they weren't silent; they were quite vocal in their endorsement of the Iraq war. - 26/05/2010 06:03:51 PM 1087 Views
more ranting doesn't support your argument - 26/05/2010 06:17:22 PM 993 Views
I'll respond to the coherent part of that. - 26/05/2010 06:30:07 PM 1035 Views
I wish ... - 26/05/2010 06:57:30 PM 1030 Views
Is the NYT any better pieces slandering McCain and his wife before an election? - 26/05/2010 07:16:58 PM 877 Views
I don't know those articles specifically. - 26/05/2010 08:27:44 PM 939 Views
These days I typically just say, "Fox. " - 27/05/2010 03:48:40 PM 1020 Views
You mean you will repsond to part that you like and ignore the part you don't because of a typo - 26/05/2010 07:18:03 PM 927 Views
Actually, I think it was a pretty thorough response. - 27/05/2010 03:57:55 PM 1020 Views
then let me make is simpler - 27/05/2010 07:23:19 PM 1010 Views
I'll give Joel a little hand here... - 26/05/2010 09:14:27 PM 1035 Views
commas are so over rated - 26/05/2010 10:50:57 PM 814 Views
I find this image to describe the deficits pretty useful - 27/05/2010 01:56:29 AM 799 Views
Here is the problem with this kind of reporting... - 27/05/2010 07:12:34 AM 927 Views
Correct - 27/05/2010 02:11:47 PM 786 Views
The problem with that kind of logic is it is wrong - 27/05/2010 02:19:37 PM 817 Views
Yes, that would be wrong. - 27/05/2010 03:35:30 PM 844 Views
Based on Obama's budget, he will add more to the debt over the next 10 years..... - 27/05/2010 04:10:45 PM 743 Views
Increasing the debt is a problem, yes. - 27/05/2010 07:55:04 PM 1209 Views
At least we agree that you are wrong because that is what you said - 27/05/2010 06:50:43 PM 794 Views
And where does the rest of the money come from? - 27/05/2010 08:12:31 PM 927 Views
No, that's for the entire Department of Defense. - 27/05/2010 08:25:28 PM 817 Views
using those numbers the war appears to be about half a drop in the bucket *NM* - 27/05/2010 08:37:31 PM 423 Views
I wouldn't call it a drop in the bucket... - 27/05/2010 09:03:43 PM 1047 Views
yeah I was just being a smart ass - 27/05/2010 11:09:37 PM 1037 Views
Re: And where does the rest of the money come from? - 27/05/2010 10:58:59 PM 948 Views
I interpreted it as saying... - 27/05/2010 02:22:13 PM 1305 Views
Hmmm... - 27/05/2010 03:41:15 PM 856 Views

Reply to Message