Active Users:427 Time:01/07/2025 04:01:42 PM
An interesting way of looking at it at the end. Joel Send a noteboard - 02/06/2010 02:05:34 AM
One's rights under Miranda haven't been lessened. This suit was an attempt to expand them, not maintain them. Everyone here knows I'm a huge proponent of personal liberties, but I don't see this ruling as some big new evil. Your right to remain silent hasn't changed. You still have the right to remain silent. Even if you don't "invoke" your right, if you don't say anything, there's nothing for the police there. Just as Miranda states, things you actually say can be used against you until you request an attorney.

Actually, if you think about it, Miranda was expanded with this ruling. Before, until you requested an attorney, they could question you no matter what you said or didn't say. Now to make them shut up, even without asking for a lawyer, all you have to say is that you're invoking your rights not to say anything. So now, anything you do say after that, can't be used against you.

I wonder if THAT would hold up in court. I kinda doubt it, because it leads back into the territory of "I'm invoking my right to remain silent. I TOTALLY did it, in case you're curious. ;)" Once again, you have the right not to be forced to give evidence against yourself; you can do so voluntarily whenever you like, and it's admissible in court. Better have it on video, that's all I can say. ;)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
SCOTUS Update: Right to remain silent? Suspect better speak up - - 01/06/2010 07:53:14 PM 1122 Views
What I don't like about this decision... - 01/06/2010 08:21:02 PM 709 Views
I think the only potential issue is if the person didn't understand the Miranda warning. - 01/06/2010 10:37:42 PM 642 Views
Damn you common sense!!! *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:56:17 AM 278 Views
that is an odd way of looking at it - 01/06/2010 11:58:12 PM 656 Views
I'm more referring to the almost "magic words" that Kennedy introduces here. - 02/06/2010 12:18:07 AM 675 Views
So we should not allow police to question people at all? - 02/06/2010 12:31:27 AM 605 Views
You won't hear me complain if the Miranda rights are scaled back a bit. - 02/06/2010 12:40:23 AM 601 Views
The goal is not to keep guilty people from confessing - 02/06/2010 01:48:48 AM 624 Views
The way I see it... - 02/06/2010 03:06:01 AM 746 Views
Seems reasonable to me - 01/06/2010 09:44:30 PM 738 Views
This seems reasonable to me. - 01/06/2010 09:47:34 PM 684 Views
Hey deaf people who can't speak... pound sand. - 01/06/2010 09:55:41 PM 738 Views
well the deaf can simply close their eyes and end the interview - 02/06/2010 12:26:31 AM 634 Views
Re: well the deaf can simply close their eyes and end the interview - 02/06/2010 03:57:35 AM 642 Views
you are often questioned by the police? What are you doing to make that happen? - 02/06/2010 03:35:47 PM 680 Views
I travel internationally - 02/06/2010 08:40:38 PM 648 Views
This decision is a setback for us all. - 01/06/2010 10:10:51 PM 753 Views
No it isn't. - 01/06/2010 10:42:06 PM 670 Views
Re: No it isn't. - 01/06/2010 11:26:07 PM 679 Views
bah - 02/06/2010 12:11:46 AM 635 Views
Teach people to say "I'm not saying anything until my lawyer gets here." Period. *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:38:24 AM 267 Views
Close, but not cigar. - 02/06/2010 01:30:19 AM 687 Views
if they catch more bad guys is that a bad thing? *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:50:12 AM 286 Views
Would you be okay with the prohibition of firearms if it lowered the crime rate? - 02/06/2010 02:18:26 AM 648 Views
I think you have to have reasonable balance - 02/06/2010 05:48:31 PM 702 Views
You are at the intersection of bull and shit. - 02/06/2010 04:00:32 PM 671 Views
Re: You are at the intersection of bull and shit. - 02/06/2010 10:18:36 PM 662 Views
Hey douchebag, you're still wrong. - 02/06/2010 10:34:48 PM 642 Views
Any particular reason you started the name calling? - 02/06/2010 10:58:47 PM 581 Views
At what point did that happen? - 02/06/2010 01:26:13 AM 604 Views
This is what I alluded to in my response. - 02/06/2010 01:44:14 AM 707 Views
Re: At what point did that happen? - 02/06/2010 01:48:52 AM 726 Views
I am confused - 01/06/2010 11:09:14 PM 657 Views
Re: I am confused - 01/06/2010 11:15:07 PM 589 Views
ummm, no... - 02/06/2010 12:13:59 AM 682 Views
Re: ummm, no... - 02/06/2010 01:38:54 AM 625 Views
spare me the pontificating - 02/06/2010 01:50:27 AM 719 Views
Re: spare me the pontificating - 02/06/2010 02:01:27 AM 612 Views
you never wave your right to remain silent forever - 02/06/2010 01:53:07 AM 597 Views
It's perhaps odd that we're on opposite sides of this. - 02/06/2010 01:59:46 AM 633 Views
Nothing has changed - 02/06/2010 01:56:08 AM 624 Views
As far as I can tell, this changes nothing and simply maintains the status quo. - 01/06/2010 11:27:36 PM 648 Views
An interesting way of looking at it at the end. - 02/06/2010 02:05:34 AM 715 Views
For those who don't understand the techniques of police interrogation let me make this clear. - 02/06/2010 01:57:51 AM 701 Views
Good advice - 02/06/2010 04:00:45 AM 584 Views
I always love in the TV shows when... - 02/06/2010 04:16:35 AM 681 Views
Re: I always love in the TV shows when... - 02/06/2010 04:36:34 AM 774 Views

Reply to Message