no. a officer is NOT only required to hold up the law.
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 22/06/2010 12:28:05 AM
Perhaps by standards of the law...sure. But by the standards of society they are also required to protect and aid citizens. If that woman had died because she hadn't gotten in to the hospital quickly enough, he could have been DIRECTLY responsible. That is inexcusable. You can't just FAKE a stroke. A glance at the woman's face should have told the policeman what was going on, and instead he detained them far longer than appropriate.
If the woman had been gushing blood, would he have detained the as well? Or would that have been "Serious enough" that he would have let them past without harassment?
this wasn't just a police officer stopping them on the way in to a building for treating a few red lights inappropriately...
This was a police officer actively preventing someone having a stroke from entering a hospital.
As a human being, he has no excuse and I dearly hope the police department does not hide behind their shield of papers.
If the woman had been gushing blood, would he have detained the as well? Or would that have been "Serious enough" that he would have let them past without harassment?
this wasn't just a police officer stopping them on the way in to a building for treating a few red lights inappropriately...
This was a police officer actively preventing someone having a stroke from entering a hospital.
As a human being, he has no excuse and I dearly hope the police department does not hide behind their shield of papers.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Police Officer stops man from entering ER while wife is having stroke
- 20/06/2010 10:08:49 PM
1590 Views
So?
- 20/06/2010 11:53:33 PM
897 Views
Carrying a woman into the ER doesn't really scream "made up excuse"
- 21/06/2010 12:24:30 AM
1386 Views
*NM*
This story betrays a simple fact: police officers often abuse their "power".
- 21/06/2010 02:23:25 AM
934 Views
Re: This story betrays a simple fact: police officers often abuse their "power".
- 21/06/2010 04:22:31 AM
1006 Views
unfortunately the law is on the officer's side, no matter whether he acted correctly
- 21/06/2010 07:09:13 AM
913 Views
well this is,really, a drastically different situation
- 21/06/2010 08:11:39 AM
966 Views
the point is, the officer is not required to show compassion, only enforce the law
- 21/06/2010 11:53:51 PM
822 Views
no. a officer is NOT only required to hold up the law.
- 22/06/2010 12:28:05 AM
834 Views
Re: unfortunately the law is on the officer's side, no matter whether he acted correctly
- 21/06/2010 02:27:59 PM
800 Views
I am sorryt but your brother-in-law didn't have the right to endanger others
- 21/06/2010 07:20:20 PM
868 Views
nobody has that right but there should be some leeway considering the circumstances *NM*
- 22/06/2010 01:31:00 AM
449 Views
At the very least the officer should have let medical personnel take the woman in for treatment
- 21/06/2010 02:56:30 PM
874 Views
"The fact is that the man broke the law" is nonsense. That's what judgment is for.
- 21/06/2010 05:30:26 PM
940 Views
But you can get pulled over for going 1 mile over.
- 21/06/2010 05:59:51 PM
947 Views
Yes, you CAN, but any cop who did is a pathetic waste, who doesn't deserve the badge *NM*
- 22/06/2010 07:06:19 AM
413 Views
But then he's have to use a cell phone while driving! Another crime! *NM*
- 22/06/2010 02:41:51 AM
478 Views
*NM*
This is ridiculous
- 22/06/2010 03:18:03 AM
984 Views
How exactly did I justify anything? Perhaps you missed the subject of my post.
- 22/06/2010 02:28:21 PM
922 Views
I'm saying the fact that the law was broken is totally irrelevent,
- 23/06/2010 02:15:56 AM
997 Views
It is sad when idiocy and a lack of judgment becomes codified into law backed with enforcement power
- 21/06/2010 09:56:32 PM
1453 Views
The cop should be fired and fined
- 23/06/2010 03:40:32 PM
863 Views