Yes.



Yes.



As happy as I probably could be; he's doing what he can with an awful situation.



Helped, by being a reasonable human being and an excellent speaker, i.e. everything Bush wasn't.



I'm satisfied with the role he and the government have played. A complete government takeover of the operations, despite how many people have clamored for it, would only have made things worse; the situational expertise just doesn't exist. I think that Obama has done a great service by securing the relief funds.



One part yes, two parts no. In the way he's worked hard on and fought for legislation, yes. He has backed off some issues, which is disappointing, but fairly inevitable. The bigger "no" part doesn't come from Obama; it's the fault of the insanely obstructionist Republican party (and, depending on the results of the 2010 midterm, the fault of an idiot electorate that seems poised to vote back in the party that's done its best to ruin all progress in this country for the past 10 years).



The stimulus, health care (although I would have loved to see a lot more, they did what they could in the context of the current Congress, and meaningful reform was passed), getting rid of DADT (although final judgment is reserved until it actually goes through), funding stem cell research, credit card reform, lowering restrictions on Cuba, reforming government student loan policy, generally increasing government transparency.



The space program, not acknowledging the Armenian Genocide, not being as strong on gay rights as promised (no DOMA repeal, no gay adoption support), appointing a drug czar who's anti-legalization for marijuana.



Maybe we wouldn't be yet, but we'd be on the path to depression with few options to get off.



Yes.

Additionally, here's a site that keeps track of how well Obama is doing with his campaign promises.