Active Users:365 Time:18/09/2025 05:55:57 PM
Yeah, Pedro shooting meant it was a new situation where Villa was onside Floffe Send a noteboard - 03/07/2010 11:56:30 PM
Which is, Villa is clearly offside at the moment Iniesta passes to Pedro. Pedro then hits the post, Villa does his post-post-net thing in the rebound. Is there some kind of resetting point at which time Villa's previous offside suddenly didn't matter anymore and so he was allowed to score on the rebound? Maybe the hitting the post part?

If Pedro had passed it to Villa there wouldn't have been an offside either. Resetting point: new player on the attacking team plays the ball (pass, shoot, head etc)
--- signature starts here ---

I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!

e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Reply to message
Well, I am glad it was Spain who got through. - 03/07/2010 10:24:01 PM 628 Views
I have a question about that goal, none of our commentators mentioned it... - 03/07/2010 10:32:44 PM 473 Views
As far as I remember it.... - 03/07/2010 10:59:22 PM 381 Views
Hm, okay. - 03/07/2010 11:58:51 PM 395 Views
Re: Hm, okay. - 04/07/2010 12:43:59 AM 403 Views
Right. Offsides is determined at the time a ball is kicked. - 04/07/2010 04:52:22 AM 368 Views
Yeah, Pedro shooting meant it was a new situation where Villa was onside - 03/07/2010 11:56:30 PM 413 Views
Was their soccer really this bad (article inside) - 04/07/2010 07:53:30 AM 534 Views
That's a bit of an exaggeration for comic effect, I'd say. - 04/07/2010 09:51:25 AM 473 Views
I thought the ball was jinxed - 04/07/2010 09:57:03 AM 594 Views
Yes - 04/07/2010 12:04:03 PM 453 Views
I would have liked them to be forced to go over 120 minutes - 04/07/2010 11:07:23 AM 421 Views
Interesting game. - 05/07/2010 10:17:46 AM 378 Views

Reply to Message