Offsides only apply if you are directly affecting the game from your position, and Villa wasn't offside when Pedro got the ball because he wasn't even close to it at that time. So therefore there is no call. When Pedro shoots, new situation and Villa is on-side again. If we compare this to the situation when Valdez scored, the player who was offside actually tried to reach the ball (directly on the pass), which makes the offside call correct.
I guess hitting the post does reset matters, then.
Not really, but Pedro taking the shot. Had Villa been offside when the shot was fired, he'd been called even if the ball bounced off the post first.
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Well, I am glad it was Spain who got through.
- 03/07/2010 10:24:01 PM
730 Views
I have a question about that goal, none of our commentators mentioned it...
- 03/07/2010 10:32:44 PM
579 Views
As far as I remember it....
- 03/07/2010 10:59:22 PM
481 Views
Yeah, Pedro shooting meant it was a new situation where Villa was onside
- 03/07/2010 11:56:30 PM
509 Views
I missed the actual goal, but saw the penalties. Apparently there was also infringement when...
- 04/07/2010 02:44:37 AM
594 Views
Torres is coming back from a fairly recent surgery. I assume that's what's ailing him. *NM*
- 04/07/2010 04:55:27 AM
475 Views
Maybe, but his surgery was quite a while ago now. He juestn't doesn't look as sharp as normal. *NM*
- 04/07/2010 08:52:58 AM
466 Views
