Active Users:528 Time:03/11/2026 08:45:27 AM
Viable alternatives Werthead Send a noteboard - 15/07/2010 01:16:39 AM
Rather than just question the viability of the premium account idea without offering alternatives, I've taken a look at how other boards handles the same issues without resorting to some sort of multi-tiered poster structure.

The first thing they do is employ Amazon and Google Ads, and make big drives to get people to order books through those ads (they get a cut of them) rather than just going to the sites direct. You have a lot of people reviewing books on this site, it should be relatively straightforward to set up a link on those reviews to the respective Amazon pages, and if people like the sound of the book they can order it that way and RAFO gets a cut of the cash. Since RAFO has provided a service in making them aware of the book, that works out. Obviously, you can also encourage the WHEEL OF TIME fanbase to order TOWERS OF MIDNIGHT via an Amazon link on the site as well.

Secondly, is the good old-fashioned pledge drive, maybe mixed in with competitions and raffles. Whenever other sites' hosting fees are coming up and they haven't made enough money via advertising, they simply say, "We need £xxx, we've provided you with countless hours of entertainment/job-endangering time-wasting, help us out," and put up a PayPal account. When they reach the amount needed, they take it down, say thanks, and sometimes throw in prizes or some sort of raffle arrangement so those who contribute get a chance of winning some books or other gear.

Thirdly, sponsorship. This is harder to get, but as an SFF-related website with several thousand members, it's possible that at least one or two publishers might consider some sort of deal in return for advertising their books on the site in a relatively non-obtrusive way. £6 a month to get their names in front of a couple of thousand book-buyers isn't a lot to a company like Tor or Orbit, especially considering the site's long association (through its direct ancestor, Wotmania, which I would recommend playing up, as Wotmania was very well-regarded by some publishers) with the WHEEL OF TIME web presence.

Just some ideas. Other sites use them to pay for much higher web hosting fees than RAFO has, so they do work.
This message last edited by Werthead on 15/07/2010 at 01:18:14 AM
Reply to message
EDIT: Remember folks, today's the last day of the free premium accounts! - 06/07/2010 08:52:02 PM 3612 Views
Awesome job, mate! - 06/07/2010 09:03:20 PM 1695 Views
I see that you've also fixed the spelling of "received" in the noteboards. - 06/07/2010 09:08:00 PM 1709 Views
Erm... can you recheck your settings? - 06/07/2010 09:20:50 PM 1645 Views
They've not changed. *NM* - 06/07/2010 09:22:07 PM 947 Views
Default quote setting is excellent - 06/07/2010 10:02:35 PM 1711 Views
Nice! - 06/07/2010 11:51:09 PM 1498 Views
Yay! - 07/07/2010 04:32:39 PM 1524 Views
Time zone - 07/07/2010 05:23:43 PM 1512 Views
Yeah, Us/Eastern is ahead an hour too. - 07/07/2010 05:44:40 PM 1672 Views
Cool, I must locate some money to get one. *NM* - 08/07/2010 03:48:59 PM 976 Views
I all of a sudden miss Wse - 10/07/2010 01:28:00 AM 1560 Views
In a way, yes *NM* - 16/07/2010 06:43:14 AM 899 Views
Just how much bandwidth is Read and Find out using per month? - 11/07/2010 05:50:02 AM 1654 Views
So, you think Ben should pay it out of his own pocket then? - 12/07/2010 09:33:27 AM 1792 Views
Oh Jing. - 12/07/2010 08:05:31 PM 1682 Views
It's a very reasonable question. - 12/07/2010 09:29:26 PM 1788 Views
Good point *NM* - 12/07/2010 09:38:25 PM 886 Views
You want to charge people for functionality every other forum on the web gives them for free? - 14/07/2010 08:47:32 PM 1859 Views
It is exactly the same stuff Mike asked money for - 14/07/2010 09:00:55 PM 1487 Views
Why can't people even ask the question(s)? - 14/07/2010 09:22:11 PM 1680 Views
Re: Why can't people even ask the question(s)? - 14/07/2010 09:36:54 PM 1747 Views
Well - 14/07/2010 09:57:09 PM 1843 Views
Exactly. - 15/07/2010 12:09:14 AM 1623 Views
The messageboards are perfectly functional without a premium account. - 14/07/2010 09:17:43 PM 1496 Views
I see it as a way of giving people something back for donations. - 14/07/2010 10:09:08 PM 1780 Views
He does have a point when it comes to hyperlinks. - 15/07/2010 06:52:41 PM 1477 Views
There are other reasons why I don't want links in posts - 15/07/2010 08:18:53 PM 1528 Views
Why is that? - 15/07/2010 09:14:52 PM 1697 Views
Viable alternatives - 15/07/2010 01:16:39 AM 1720 Views
I have to agree with you here - 16/07/2010 06:55:43 AM 1498 Views
Advertising makes a site look like shit. - 16/07/2010 08:28:00 AM 1372 Views
Only if you choose to let it. - 16/07/2010 12:17:47 PM 1710 Views
This is just the BBforum argument rehashed. - 16/07/2010 06:07:20 PM 1677 Views
But those are the very things being introduced by the premium accounts. - 17/07/2010 12:44:05 PM 1725 Views
Re: One Thing - 17/07/2010 04:24:51 PM 1622 Views
Agreed. - 17/07/2010 04:34:09 PM 1595 Views
RAFO is a lot of great things, but great-looking it is not. - 16/07/2010 02:28:50 PM 1606 Views
As I've said above... - 16/07/2010 01:49:37 PM 1684 Views
Just to be clear: - 16/07/2010 03:18:22 PM 1637 Views
Re: As I've said above... - 16/07/2010 05:58:39 PM 1633 Views
Premium Plus account does. - 16/07/2010 06:05:07 PM 1671 Views
Re: Premium Plus account does. - 16/07/2010 06:13:17 PM 1497 Views
Re: Premium Plus account does. - 16/07/2010 09:03:27 PM 1480 Views
And - 17/07/2010 04:37:12 PM 1592 Views
To be honest, that misses part of the appeal for some of us - 17/07/2010 12:17:15 AM 1578 Views
It's a start - 16/07/2010 06:37:44 PM 1611 Views
Yeah, that's the other thing. - 16/07/2010 08:59:51 PM 1616 Views
Go Ben! \o/ *NM* - 18/07/2010 02:52:30 AM 786 Views
That's the root of the problem. - 21/07/2010 01:10:56 PM 1812 Views
Question - 18/07/2010 12:02:02 PM 1760 Views
I think it's reasonable - 17/07/2010 12:33:56 AM 1834 Views
I like it, and thanks =) - 23/07/2010 12:43:11 PM 1498 Views
I don't really have a problem paying - I just dislike Paypal. - 03/08/2010 05:53:14 PM 2053 Views

Reply to Message