Active Users:565 Time:20/12/2025 06:47:11 PM
Your religious beliefs have 100% to do with your position. Tom Send a noteboard - 05/08/2010 09:43:23 PM
Your views are grounded neither in science, nor logic, nor fact. I bring up Creationism because that, like your stand on gay marriage, is based 100% on blind faith and not one whit on science, logic or fact. It is entirely pertinent to the discussion.

For the record, I find it laughable that two or three sentences in the New Testament (some of them of questionable authorship in the eyes of modern Biblical scholars) are enough to condemn an entire segment of the population to live as second-class citizens. Jesus never mentioned homosexuality once, nor did he preach the sort of intolerance that many churches established in His name do. This is no different than the way that churches supported slavery and then, after the Civil War, laws against miscegenation and equal rights for blacks on the basis of a few sentences in the Bible. More was said by St. Paul about how women should always wear hats in church than about homosexuality, but you don't see women wearing hats in church. It's just another example of being selective in faith.

And yes, I do think that race and sexual identity can be equated. People are killed, often after being brutally tortured, because of their sexuality and their sexual identity. I think you pointed out to me that I should avoid the words "sexual preference" for now because they imply a choice. Science has shown that it is highly unlikely there is a choice.

I am not a biologist and do not have access to a full research library. I will ask a friend who has a Ph.D. in biology to supply me with some good citations for the work you are requesting. Until then, I will not let the perfect be the enemy of the good, and will cite the studies which, according to Wikipedia, have yielded positive results.

They are:

Hershberger, Scott L. 2001. Biological Factors in the Development of Sexual Orientation. Pp. 27–51 in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities and Youth: Psychological Perspectives, edited by Anthony R. D’Augelli and Charlotte J. Patterson. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Quoted in Bearman and Bruckner, 2002.

Bailey JM, Dunne MP, Martin NG (March 2000). "Genetic and environmental influences on sexual orientation and its correlates in an Australian twin sample". J Pers Soc Psychol 78 (3): 524–36. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.524. PMID 10743878. http://content.apa.org/journals/psp/78/3/524.

Bocklandt S, Horvath S, Vilain E, Hamer DH (February 2006). "Extreme skewing of X chromosome inactivation in mothers of homosexual men". Hum. Genet. 118 (6): 691–4. doi:10.1007/s00439-005-0119-4. PMID 16369763. http://repositories.cdlib.org/postprints/1413.

Blanchard R, Klassen P (April 1997). "H-Y antigen and homosexuality in men". J. Theor. Biol. 185 (3): 373–8. doi:10.1006/jtbi.1996.0315. PMID 9156085.

Garcia-Falgueras A, Swaab DF (2010). "Sexual Hormones and the Brain: An Essential Alliance for Sexual Identity and Sexual Orientation". Endocr Dev 17: 22–35. doi:10.1159/000262525. PMID 19955753.




That's an explicit denial of the existence of homosexuals. Science has fairly convincingly proven that homosexuality is a biological condition, not a choice. I wouldn't expect someone like you, who believes crazy myths about a 7-day creation, to understand that, but you are making a pernicious argument in bad faith and you know it damn well.

Try saying "Blacks have every opportunity to go to school so they shouldn't need to go to the same ones as whites" and see how far that logic gets you.


Prove it. Show me a respected scientific journal which states the biologically proven trigger which initiates homosexuality. I remember that I got into this debate with Chorabliss one time, and he was unable to show me said journal article. He sent me a link regarding the topic which was more along the lines of a psychological journal article on how to deal with homosexuality. Even in that article, it very clearly said that there is the idea that homosexuality could have a biological root, but that it is not proven. The article went on and on about how to psycholocial aspects of homosexuality and individuals and their interaction within their own minds and their interactions with others.

I find it interesting then that you bring up my creation views and everything also. *heh* I'm also one of those crazies who believes that abortion is wrong because its killing an innocent person. Does that matter in this debate? I'm also one who doesn't like curry when prepared in an Indian dish, but can tolerate it with Thai food. Does that matter? I'm also a firm believer that everone is deserving of health care, but not entitled to it. Does that matter? So then why do you phrase my belief system in such a way as to discredit my viewpoint? Talk about not cool.

And you know very well that there is a world of difference between someone's race and someone's sexual preference.

~Jeordam
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Judge rules California's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional - 04/08/2010 10:40:50 PM 1465 Views
Thank God. *NM* - 04/08/2010 10:52:30 PM 419 Views
Amen. *NM* - 05/08/2010 02:09:24 AM 480 Views
Good news, but as the article says, it'll go all the way to the SC. - 04/08/2010 10:55:58 PM 795 Views
So then is that how we do it? - 04/08/2010 11:01:19 PM 934 Views
Of course. - 04/08/2010 11:04:59 PM 827 Views
His point was - 04/08/2010 11:40:14 PM 971 Views
Yeah but: What Ghavrel said below *NM* - 05/08/2010 08:01:02 AM 468 Views
And again... - 05/08/2010 06:08:56 PM 694 Views
well that is sort of the idea of how democracy works - 04/08/2010 11:06:57 PM 821 Views
I'm not the one who came up with the referendum system, you do realize. - 04/08/2010 11:11:13 PM 816 Views
The referendum system, in my opinion, has been a failure, especially in CA. - 04/08/2010 11:46:21 PM 909 Views
democracy has been a failure in CA. - 05/08/2010 02:42:21 PM 681 Views
No. It just shows the problems of a crazy electorate. - 05/08/2010 03:29:21 PM 827 Views
I think you made my point *NM* - 05/08/2010 03:35:00 PM 436 Views
About Californians being crazy, yes. *NM* - 05/08/2010 04:53:32 PM 405 Views
we vote fro way to much crap in general - 05/08/2010 02:41:19 PM 775 Views
Yeah, I agree. - 05/08/2010 04:11:34 PM 758 Views
my one recent dealing with our criminal justice - 05/08/2010 04:25:30 PM 785 Views
There are certain things that should not be decided by a vote... - 05/08/2010 02:02:45 AM 847 Views
I do agree with you on that. Hell yes, and on a subject like this in particular. - 05/08/2010 02:17:24 AM 875 Views
Re: I do agree with you on that. Hell yes, and on a subject like this in particular. - 05/08/2010 10:46:54 AM 854 Views
I understand it. - 05/08/2010 03:06:40 PM 844 Views
I know you don't support proposition 8 - 05/08/2010 03:29:34 PM 859 Views
- 05/08/2010 03:34:01 PM 865 Views
But that is just simplistic and silly to complain about when it is a long standing possibility - 05/08/2010 03:46:59 PM 756 Views
Oh, ees it? - 05/08/2010 04:07:39 PM 883 Views
Well they knew the rules before they started the whole thing - 05/08/2010 04:12:33 PM 764 Views
Why would you complain if you won? - 05/08/2010 04:15:20 PM 832 Views
You could recognise that you won by the system working in a way you don't like? - 05/08/2010 04:23:58 PM 707 Views
I'm sure that happens, in general. - 06/08/2010 02:43:18 PM 699 Views
It seems to happen a lot nowadays - 06/08/2010 03:06:33 PM 718 Views
instead it should be decided by judges who answer to no one? *NM* - 05/08/2010 07:12:59 AM 420 Views
The same judges who upheld our private right to bear arms. - 05/08/2010 02:09:07 PM 846 Views
not when judges stop using the Constitution - 05/08/2010 02:30:51 PM 829 Views
Sexual preference is not the right being protected. - 05/08/2010 03:22:04 PM 887 Views
I know that the 14th amendment is routinely used in ways it was never intended. - 05/08/2010 05:25:07 PM 802 Views
I realize that, but it is ultimately a good thing. - 05/08/2010 05:31:19 PM 875 Views
I am really on the fence a bit on the whole issue - 05/08/2010 06:00:59 PM 846 Views
I generally agree with you. - 05/08/2010 06:33:56 PM 829 Views
let's take away the citizenship of all black people if that's the way you think - 05/08/2010 09:06:23 PM 731 Views
Come now lets not be stupid - 06/08/2010 05:31:18 PM 695 Views
sorry but your statement was completely ignorant. - 06/08/2010 07:27:09 PM 818 Views
I will talk as soon as you stop spouting stupid rhetoric and say something relevant - 06/08/2010 07:54:09 PM 784 Views
bullshit. you will personally attack me no matter what i say. - 07/08/2010 02:04:04 PM 835 Views
Let's just be clear about which amendment is which. - 05/08/2010 11:50:57 PM 736 Views
but that still ignores intent and expands the law in ways not intnented when it created - 06/08/2010 04:53:43 AM 755 Views
Yes, no, no, and no. - 06/08/2010 05:29:09 AM 804 Views
there are serious flaws in your thinking here - 06/08/2010 06:18:13 PM 876 Views
Your assertions continue to lack support. - 06/08/2010 07:23:17 PM 904 Views
not all you just refuse to see things you disagree with - 06/08/2010 08:36:32 PM 862 Views
...said the pot to the kettle - 06/08/2010 09:17:28 PM 939 Views
yes but a shiny stainless steel pot - 09/08/2010 11:21:33 PM 997 Views
You continue to be wrong about history and the role of courts. - 10/08/2010 01:05:39 AM 1337 Views
If he's wrong, a lot of law scholars and Supreme Court Justices are wrong. - 10/08/2010 01:44:05 AM 779 Views
Brown vs. Board of Education, 'nuff said. *NM* - 10/08/2010 04:32:37 AM 419 Views
part oif the problem appears to be you completely missing the point - 10/08/2010 01:23:19 PM 995 Views
let my simplify my argument - 10/08/2010 01:42:47 PM 723 Views
Since when is marriage a right? *NM* - 05/08/2010 04:11:16 PM 404 Views
it may not be a "right"... - 05/08/2010 04:22:44 PM 729 Views
This is where the debate comes into play.... - 05/08/2010 05:04:08 PM 754 Views
How much would it change the debate if it was nurture, really? - 05/08/2010 09:48:22 PM 790 Views
except this is not merely a matter of changing society - 05/08/2010 11:18:48 PM 824 Views
1948. *NM* - 05/08/2010 04:50:30 PM 404 Views
It's a benefit that is being extended selectively to one set of the populace. - 05/08/2010 04:52:52 PM 814 Views
Hey, I'm single.... - 05/08/2010 05:05:41 PM 737 Views
That's a specious argument and you know it. - 05/08/2010 05:13:17 PM 800 Views
A homosexual has every opportunity as well..... - 05/08/2010 05:23:56 PM 754 Views
Oh quit the bullshit already. - 05/08/2010 05:29:15 PM 987 Views
Slow your role... - 05/08/2010 09:08:54 PM 862 Views
Your religious beliefs have 100% to do with your position. - 05/08/2010 09:43:23 PM 893 Views
Sorry, but what a nonsense. - 05/08/2010 09:27:17 PM 737 Views
hey that's it, jens! you solved the WHOLE PROBLEM!!! - 05/08/2010 11:24:29 PM 855 Views
ON TO WORLD HUNGER! - 06/08/2010 07:59:51 AM 741 Views
LET THEM HAVE CAEK. *NM* - 06/08/2010 02:29:56 PM 386 Views
Are you sure it's wise to feed people on a lie? *NM* - 06/08/2010 02:34:26 PM 478 Views
People are fed lies all the time - 06/08/2010 09:30:37 PM 723 Views
I agree with you - 05/08/2010 05:06:40 PM 788 Views
That's not valid. - 05/08/2010 05:26:50 PM 784 Views
I invite you to read the judge's conclusions, linked again inside. - 05/08/2010 11:43:44 PM 834 Views
Since 1948 - 06/08/2010 04:01:02 AM 970 Views
gah. can. only. see. typo. *NM* - 06/08/2010 03:43:21 PM 381 Views
I don't see any typo... *NM* - 06/08/2010 04:07:18 PM 435 Views
Open the link. *NM* - 06/08/2010 04:47:04 PM 536 Views
Oh, right. Yeah, that does kinda detract from things. *NM* - 06/08/2010 04:48:47 PM 416 Views
I agree - 05/08/2010 07:22:17 AM 801 Views
And Civil Rights lost the Democrats the South. - 05/08/2010 03:44:56 PM 813 Views
but it was done by congress passing laws and the president signing those laws - 05/08/2010 04:20:19 PM 762 Views
uhm, what? - 05/08/2010 04:24:43 PM 748 Views
those were mostly rulings up holding laws not stiking them down - 05/08/2010 05:05:15 PM 840 Views
I was under the impression that the supreme court had a role in it - 05/08/2010 04:31:51 PM 750 Views
but the court was not over turning the laws passed by congress - 05/08/2010 05:11:06 PM 810 Views
No, like in this case, isn't it? - 05/08/2010 05:24:19 PM 730 Views
I would say that is another case of judicial activism and shows the danger of the practice - 05/08/2010 05:43:02 PM 715 Views
Which one is? I imagine from different view points both are. - 06/08/2010 10:34:11 AM 705 Views
The law wasn't constitutional. - 07/08/2010 06:17:04 AM 742 Views
well it will take a higher court to decide that - 09/08/2010 10:46:15 PM 774 Views
Hard to believe it's the same governor who said "Gay marriage should be between a man and a woman." *NM* - 04/08/2010 11:05:45 PM 491 Views
Or "Iff it bleeds we can kill itt!" *NM* - 04/08/2010 11:14:45 PM 470 Views
Another step in the right direction. *NM* - 04/08/2010 11:08:15 PM 493 Views
Link to the full court order inside: - 04/08/2010 11:43:29 PM 946 Views
The judge quoting Scalia in favour of gay marriage is fairly amusing. - 04/08/2010 11:50:47 PM 803 Views
What page was that on? - 05/08/2010 11:25:49 AM 718 Views
Nah, it was way above page 109, in the findings of fact somewhere. - 05/08/2010 12:37:48 PM 832 Views
Oh, that is brilliant. - 05/08/2010 01:12:21 PM 733 Views
Pretty much. - 05/08/2010 01:44:22 PM 860 Views
I've always wondered what basis there is for banning necrophilia if "it's disgusting" is invalid. - 05/08/2010 01:51:19 PM 812 Views
because you cannot give consent when you are dead? - 05/08/2010 03:04:46 PM 818 Views
what if you give consent while you are still alive? - 05/08/2010 03:21:59 PM 896 Views
Is it then illegal? - 05/08/2010 03:23:46 PM 808 Views
I would think it would be illegal even then - 05/08/2010 03:34:31 PM 828 Views
Wikipedia to the rescue! - 05/08/2010 04:20:15 PM 975 Views
A dead body is just an object, not a person with rights. - 05/08/2010 03:27:08 PM 814 Views
Yes, but - 06/08/2010 08:42:05 AM 762 Views
Absolutely not. - 06/08/2010 03:21:14 PM 812 Views
not to mention necrophilia has a large potential to be hazardous to health. - 06/08/2010 09:42:43 PM 907 Views
That was a very well written judgement. - 05/08/2010 11:24:38 AM 822 Views
- 05/08/2010 12:10:02 AM 816 Views
Totally agree. - 05/08/2010 01:01:42 PM 858 Views
+1 *NM* - 05/08/2010 03:42:08 PM 432 Views
Irrelevant decision.....this was heading to SCOTUS from day 1 *NM* - 05/08/2010 12:53:26 AM 448 Views

Reply to Message