Active Users:613 Time:11/09/2026 08:55:11 PM
Except, of course, that you just did. Joel Send a noteboard - 22/08/2010 12:30:00 PM
You just didn't bother answering my legitimate and sincere question. Oh, well....
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
An amusing column on the NYC mosque by Maureen Dowd.... - 20/08/2010 12:33:27 AM 1602 Views
wow, that was an interesting read - 20/08/2010 02:03:52 AM 964 Views
Gingrich thinks he is a deep thinker? - 20/08/2010 09:42:15 AM 804 Views
We've been through this, too, haven't we? - 20/08/2010 10:12:15 AM 1110 Views
He makes historical references as often as possible, or at least in pretty much everything I've seen - 20/08/2010 12:37:02 PM 956 Views
As he was a history professor and writes histories and alternate histories, this is not surprising - 20/08/2010 05:33:48 PM 1104 Views
I'm aware of that - 20/08/2010 11:47:32 PM 830 Views
Re: I'm aware of that - 21/08/2010 12:40:29 AM 1107 Views
Re: I'm aware of that - 21/08/2010 01:19:37 AM 969 Views
Re: I'm aware of that - 21/08/2010 01:59:48 AM 867 Views
Conservatives love Rome. I don't know why. - 21/08/2010 01:20:27 AM 907 Views
Rome was more often than not governed by aristocrats and did, after all, invent the republic. - 21/08/2010 04:50:53 PM 1245 Views
"One man, one vote" always reminds me of Pratchett - 21/08/2010 05:03:35 PM 876 Views
Me too *NM* - 21/08/2010 06:53:22 PM 538 Views
Except there doesn't seem to be any conflict between either position. - 20/08/2010 10:06:20 AM 1065 Views
When has logical consistency trumped politics? *NM* - 20/08/2010 01:50:55 PM 444 Views
True, but it does mean there's no "there" there. - 20/08/2010 02:41:49 PM 885 Views
He has to learn he needs to be crystal clear on sensitive issues - 20/08/2010 02:03:43 PM 1102 Views
In Washington, one must always present the APPEARANCE of integrity... - 20/08/2010 02:40:24 PM 1001 Views
Clinton lied about the BJ but what is your airtight proof that Bush lied? - 20/08/2010 07:44:53 PM 1075 Views
Ask and ye shall receive: - 21/08/2010 06:42:50 PM 1252 Views
This is a bit along the lines of what I have been thinking. - 20/08/2010 07:49:15 PM 1093 Views
that sort of illustrates the problem - 20/08/2010 08:56:42 PM 923 Views
It does - 22/08/2010 04:56:54 PM 843 Views
Can't find anything now on the context of the second statement. - 21/08/2010 05:05:51 PM 978 Views
I didn't see the problem either. He was simply stating the obvious. - 21/08/2010 01:39:44 AM 825 Views
maybe - 21/08/2010 02:49:40 AM 1068 Views
Wow that is probably the best Dowd column I have ever read - 21/08/2010 01:35:36 AM 845 Views
Yes, his backtracking was quite pussy-ish. *NM* - 21/08/2010 04:00:31 AM 411 Views
How did he "backtrack" exactly? - 21/08/2010 04:35:33 PM 1152 Views
c'mon Joel. are you being intentionally thick? - 21/08/2010 05:02:27 PM 1157 Views
Having read those quotes I don't think he was backtracking on anything. (With link to speech) - 22/08/2010 06:27:06 AM 1106 Views
*NM* - 22/08/2010 01:37:23 PM 443 Views
did you take into your consideration - 22/08/2010 03:50:59 PM 844 Views
I can't imagine why they would express concern over it. It wasn't controversial. That is on them - 22/08/2010 03:58:32 PM 1036 Views
that would be - 22/08/2010 04:02:08 PM 1129 Views
But quote B just reiterated what he said the first time. - 22/08/2010 04:13:21 PM 1003 Views
I agree he is not backtracking - 22/08/2010 06:49:36 PM 940 Views
I agree with you, Joel and Tash on this one. - 22/08/2010 07:52:34 PM 1018 Views
While we're picking sides, I'm with Mook and Roland. - 22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM 872 Views
I never fail to be impressed with your intelligence - 22/08/2010 08:25:11 PM 1029 Views
I like how he's got rhetorical talents when it works - 22/08/2010 08:32:15 PM 893 Views
nope just human *NM* - 22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM 470 Views
that's not what Paul just said. - 22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM 965 Views
He couldn't stay out, no. - 22/08/2010 08:56:47 PM 1030 Views
I don't want to argue with you on a Sunday, my religion says I have to relax. - 22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM 1016 Views
key word: seem - 22/08/2010 09:06:40 PM 944 Views
I was only using that term for you guys. I don't feel like beating you with a rolling pin until you - 22/08/2010 09:14:39 PM 829 Views
good thing - 22/08/2010 09:39:52 PM 1232 Views
he could have and should have stayed out - 22/08/2010 09:57:57 PM 966 Views
I think he's certainly got rhetoric talents... - 22/08/2010 08:54:11 PM 1410 Views
You don't really seem like you're taking a side to me. - 22/08/2010 09:14:02 PM 1056 Views
I'm not even taking the time to comment on something so obvious as what he did. *NM* - 22/08/2010 02:53:10 AM 538 Views
Except, of course, that you just did. - 22/08/2010 12:30:00 PM 967 Views
Joel - 22/08/2010 05:37:45 AM 1151 Views
That last line was golden. *NM* - 22/08/2010 05:40:56 AM 500 Views
His phrasing in the first speech implied that it was a bad idea. But legally they have the right. - 22/08/2010 06:32:59 AM 1073 Views
nonsense - 22/08/2010 03:39:30 PM 1014 Views
I still don't see how it can be misinterpreted except by intent by the listener. - 22/08/2010 04:08:52 PM 982 Views
so we have reached the point of no return... - 22/08/2010 04:18:46 PM 999 Views
In your case it would have to be number 2. - 22/08/2010 07:38:20 PM 975 Views
ah, but I have no agenda here... - 22/08/2010 07:41:59 PM 805 Views
lol.<3 - 22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM 979 Views
that it is... - 22/08/2010 08:57:05 PM 990 Views
Tash you are very much a fair person in this world - 22/08/2010 08:34:38 PM 1070 Views
Or there is another option: 3) He was using tact. - 22/08/2010 09:01:49 PM 998 Views
On the off chance that this: - 23/08/2010 12:38:48 AM 1176 Views
I do remember your reply... - 23/08/2010 02:57:29 AM 1442 Views
Lies, prevarication and deceit again, eh? - 22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM 1452 Views
that was a decent explanation.... - 22/08/2010 05:18:18 PM 910 Views
Thanks. - 22/08/2010 05:41:28 PM 988 Views
I do feel bad for them - 22/08/2010 08:40:36 PM 885 Views
Re: Joel - 22/08/2010 07:53:51 PM 1050 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 22/08/2010 08:25:38 PM 598 Views

Reply to Message