Active Users:894 Time:31/07/2026 04:57:07 PM
You an deveryone else seriously misunderstands the Volt. everynametaken Send a noteboard - 01/09/2010 12:52:23 AM
The short-term boost that may have been generated by pumping money into GM, combined with the "cash-for-clunkers" stimulus of last year, may be translating into a short-term profit (and a very thin one at that). However, once the Volt comes out, you will see losses. It is too expensive for what it does, and reducing the cost is not an option because it has a high production cost. If the government were to support GM in a long-term fashion, the Volt MIGHT be able to come down in price due to streamlining the process, but not fast enough to compete with Japanese hybrids and electrics.



The Volt is technology that was and still is meant to be futuristic and it was NEVER going to be the backbone of GM and still isn't. And, it was always going to be released to a limited amount of markets and it was always going to be around 40,000. As I point out below, your perception that GM is throwing all its chips in the pot with the Volt is not correct. The entire project of the Volt and its battery technology was driven by competition with Toyota and Honda hybrids not by the government. The government may portray the battery tech of the Volt as the future (and Volt-like vehicles may indeed play a part in the future) but it has never been anything more than another project at GM. GM is developing multiple other projects that are not battery based that should be very competitive.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
A quote regarding the Soviet economy that can be applied to the Obama Administration. - 29/08/2010 08:07:11 PM 1405 Views
the Copernecian model bit was a tad exaggerated - 29/08/2010 08:28:41 PM 910 Views
I wish I could believe the Democrats were only behaving "as" poorly. - 29/08/2010 09:50:23 PM 928 Views
the sad thing is, I really don't think it has to be that way - 29/08/2010 10:31:16 PM 953 Views
This is a classic mistake of the independent voter. - 30/08/2010 12:35:33 AM 931 Views
mmm fair enough - 30/08/2010 01:02:31 AM 961 Views
You cannot seriously agree with the Republicans about extending the Bush tax cuts. - 30/08/2010 09:07:59 AM 809 Views
I would target lowering the corporate rate and helping pass-through entities with cuts. - 30/08/2010 02:52:55 PM 873 Views
How many companies actually pay that corporate tax rate, though? - 30/08/2010 03:37:47 PM 1007 Views
In reality, virtually no company in the US pays anywhere near the actual corporate tax rate. - 31/08/2010 11:12:05 AM 947 Views
Where are you getting your "information"? *NM* - 31/08/2010 04:24:47 PM 371 Views
Are you saying companies are actually paying 35% in corporate taxes? - 31/08/2010 10:11:28 PM 866 Views
God help us if we ever end up at the OECD average! - 31/08/2010 10:30:34 PM 825 Views
Which have corporate tax rates equal to or lower than that 35%. - 01/09/2010 01:04:34 AM 1150 Views
Absolutely not. - 01/09/2010 04:13:24 AM 838 Views
The pot shouldn't call the kettle black - 01/09/2010 10:10:42 AM 1049 Views
So you admit... - 01/09/2010 10:22:24 AM 983 Views
Tax cuts should relate to domestic hiring. - 31/08/2010 11:42:11 AM 962 Views
So what you are saying is that for someone like you, it is all about how dishonest you think they ar - 30/08/2010 03:17:27 PM 1090 Views
Oh, I concede we're screwed over. - 31/08/2010 06:22:44 PM 862 Views
Soviet economy is an oxymoron - 29/08/2010 10:13:38 PM 1026 Views
The only nation "without" an economy is likely North Korea. - 30/08/2010 12:41:19 AM 865 Views
It is true, I know no republicans personally who espouse a Copernican Model of the Universe - 29/08/2010 10:16:38 PM 939 Views
The sun is the center of our solar system. - 30/08/2010 12:42:34 AM 916 Views
More or less - 30/08/2010 01:55:00 AM 938 Views
I loved a quote I saw recently from a retired Navy veteran... - 29/08/2010 10:21:27 PM 1010 Views
Excellent quote. *NM* - 30/08/2010 12:36:20 AM 342 Views
For all of the talk about republican social issues even with a majority they didn't do much about it - 29/08/2010 10:25:22 PM 1057 Views
that's one reason why I'm O.K. voting republican - 29/08/2010 10:37:02 PM 941 Views
But it often costs them the center in elections, too. - 30/08/2010 12:28:43 AM 857 Views
ignoring the social conseratives would not work either - 30/08/2010 03:09:21 PM 913 Views
I have a strong dislike for Hilary Clinton. - 29/08/2010 11:38:10 PM 882 Views
I find myself regretting that she didn't beat Obama in the primaries. - 30/08/2010 12:30:28 AM 826 Views
I would have voted for her in the general. *NM* - 30/08/2010 03:29:01 AM 361 Views
Interesting comparison - 30/08/2010 04:19:40 AM 867 Views
possibly because.... - 30/08/2010 04:24:23 AM 909 Views
I'm curious... - 31/08/2010 12:08:44 PM 1034 Views
Lower taxes and cut costs, and cutting regulation. - 30/08/2010 02:55:19 PM 993 Views
That's why I'm a Libertarian - 30/08/2010 09:22:18 AM 879 Views
Strict libertarians are disliked for some of their own insane ideas. - 31/08/2010 06:21:12 PM 756 Views
Oh, but that just sounds like insanity - 01/09/2010 07:54:09 AM 1089 Views
I don't know MUCH about politics - however.. - 30/08/2010 01:49:03 PM 953 Views
If Republicans focus more on the economy, we have our best chances. - 31/08/2010 06:18:49 PM 734 Views
ME TOO - 02/09/2010 06:53:43 PM 798 Views
Actually, General Motors has made quite a turnaround, the company is actually making profit now. - 31/08/2010 10:44:15 AM 965 Views
The Economist is being uncharacteristically optimistic on this point. - 31/08/2010 06:17:51 PM 763 Views
You an deveryone else seriously misunderstands the Volt. - 01/09/2010 12:52:23 AM 982 Views
They have reasons in being uncharacteristically optimistic. - 01/09/2010 09:57:10 AM 1065 Views
why do you think Ford is doing so well? - 01/09/2010 01:54:11 PM 925 Views
Your undersanding of electric cars at GM is incorrect. - 01/09/2010 12:44:36 AM 954 Views

Reply to Message